Which Math Book Should I Get for Multivariable Calculus?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the best approach to learning multivariable calculus before tackling analysis in "Baby Rudin." The participant currently knows only single-variable calculus and is considering resources to bridge the gap. Suggestions include "Calculus Vol. 2" by Apostol for its rigor, though it may be time-consuming, and Lang's "Calculus of Several Variables" for a less rigorous introduction. However, both texts do not cover differential forms, which are also deemed challenging to learn from Rudin. An alternative recommended is Hubbard's "Vector Calculus, Linear Algebra, and Differential Forms," noted for its good reputation. Additionally, it is advised to avoid learning measure theory and Lebesgue integration directly from Rudin, with Bartle's "The Elements of Integration and Lebesgue Measure" suggested as a better resource. Overall, the consensus leans towards completing foundational topics before diving into more complex material in Rudin.
GeneralOJB
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
I am currently reading baby Rudin, but I only know single-variable calculus at the moment, so I think it would be a good idea to learn the multi-variable stuff non-rigorously before I do the analysis in Rudin (chapters 9-11).

So I was thinking of either getting one of the many 'Mathematical methods for...' books or 'Calculus vol.2' by Apostol. Which would be better?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why not a cheap book like the following one? I'm thinking, why not finish with the single-variable topics first, get them done and out the way, then learn the multivariable material rigorously from the start? I mean, you're learning analysis so you might as well put it to use.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0486457958/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, I was planning on doing that, I thought it might be quite difficult to learn it straight from Rudin though. I'll see how it goes.
 
GeneralOJB said:
I am currently reading baby Rudin, but I only know single-variable calculus at the moment, so I think it would be a good idea to learn the multi-variable stuff non-rigorously before I do the analysis in Rudin (chapters 9-11).

So I was thinking of either getting one of the many 'Mathematical methods for...' books or 'Calculus vol.2' by Apostol. Which would be better?
Apostol is pretty rigorous and it will take you quite a while to hack your way through. If you want a less rigorous but really excellent introduction, get Lang's Calculus of Several Variables.

Neither Apostol nor Lang does differential forms, though, and Rudin would be a horrible place to learn this (or any of the material in chapters 9-11, for that matter). An alternative would be Hubbard's Vector Calculus, Linear Algebra, and Differential Forms: A Unified Approach, which I have not read but which has a very good reputation. Personally I don't see the point of trying to learn differential forms without having learned the "classical" treatment as in Lang, but that's just my preference.

If I recall correctly, Rudin does measure theory and Lebesgue integration in chapter 10 and/or 11. None of the above books will help you with this, and I would NOT advise learning it from Rudin. Almost any other book covering this material will be a better choice. A nice efficient (but expensive) choice would be Bartle's The Elements of Integration and Lebesgue Measure.
 
I'd skip chapters 9-11 of Rudin. The materials are better treated elsewhere.

You'll need vol 1 and vol 2 of Apostol for complete treatment of multivariable calculus.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
30
Views
7K
Replies
11
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
7K
Back
Top