Which math field is growing the fastest now?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kramer733
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the perception that statistics, particularly through chaos theory, is the fastest-growing field in mathematics, potentially overshadowing traditional areas like calculus and algebra. While some believe certain fields, such as point-set topology, have stagnated and are now considered auxiliary, others argue that research continues across all mathematical disciplines. There is ongoing exploration in areas like Calculus of Variations and Geometric Measure Theory, indicating that discoveries are still being made. The conversation also touches on the relevance of nets and filters in topology, suggesting they could be integrated into courses on Riemann-Stieltjes integration. Overall, the landscape of mathematical research remains dynamic, with various fields still ripe for discovery.
kramer733
Messages
322
Reaction score
0
So my math teacher (who has a honours in math) said that his friend who's doing her phd on math told him (yes that's a lot of he says she says) that the field that's going to have the most discoveries is in statistics because of "chaos theory". Is this true? So does this mean that calculus, algebra have stagnated? Is there nothing else to discover?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There is research going on in all fields. See Calculus of Variations and Geometric Measure Theory, Homotopy Theory, etc. Perhaps Chaos Theory is special, but research is done where the person is interested and has a good background in; there are always things to discover.
 
Actually, there are fields that are stagnant' tapped out, and are now at best
auxiliary. Point-set topology is one of them. Talk to anyone today about Lindeloff
spaces, metrizability, etc., and they will look at you as saying: what.?, or , why
would anyone care.?
 
Bacle said:
Actually, there are fields that are stagnant' tapped out, and are now at best
auxiliary. Point-set topology is one of them. Talk to anyone today about Lindeloff
spaces, metrizability, etc., and they will look at you as saying: what.?, or , why
would anyone care.?

I think nets & filters could be added to that list, but I think nets should make a comeback. Prob 2H in Kelley's topology text could be part of a course on Riemann-Stieltjes integration. I think they've always been done in topology because nets & filters are equivalent but I don't seen why nets couldn't be done right after the Riemann integral, as if to say "see how much easier it is with nets?"
 
Last edited:
My impression is that point-set topology becomes more of set theory now days
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
7K
Replies
71
Views
815
Replies
26
Views
7K
Replies
42
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Back
Top