Which Nuclide, 235U or 239Pu, Has a Smaller Critical Mass and Why

trv
Messages
72
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Which of the two nuclides 235U and 239Pu has a smaller critical mass and why


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



i'm thinking 239Pu since it produces more neutrons on average per fission. Would that be correct? Are there any other reasons I can add?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What has to happen to the neutrons that are produced?
 
Hmmm cause more fissions? Ok so their lifetimes should matter too, as the longer neutrinos last the more fissions that could potentially cause. But should this be different for the two cases?

Or are you more leading me towards the respective cross-sections? As far as I know, in 235U fission can be induced even by a 0 energy neutron while high energy neutrons are needed for Pu. But then again, cross-section of fission falls for 235U for higher neutron energies. So the answer would depend on the neutron energies. :S.
 
trv said:
Or are you more leading me towards the respective cross-sections? ...so the answer would depend on the neutron energies. :S.
Yes .
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top