Which of the following reactions is likely more exothermic?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining which reaction is more exothermic between vaporized sodium reacting with chlorine gas and solid sodium reacting with chlorine gas to form sodium chloride. It is argued that the first reaction is likely more exothermic due to the transition from gas phase sodium to solid sodium chloride, which involves significant energy release. The second reaction, involving solid sodium, has an enthalpy of formation of zero, making it less exothermic. The application of Hess's law supports the conclusion that the first reaction is favored due to the additional heat released during condensation. Overall, the first reaction is deemed more exothermic due to the phase change involved.
Qube
Gold Member
Messages
461
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Which of the following reactions is likely more exothermic?

1) Vaporized sodium metal reacts with diatomic chlorine gas to form one mole of solid sodium chloride.

2) Solid sodium metal reacts with diatomic chlorine gas to form one mole of solid sodium chloride.


Homework Equations



Exothermic - bond improvement or formation.

The Attempt at a Solution



I would think that the first reaction is more exothermic since we are going from gas phase sodium metal to solid sodium chloride.

The second choice parallels the first choice except for the fact we're dealing with solid sodium metal (which is at its standard state and thus its enthalpy of formation is 0).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, first reaction would be "better" by condensation heat.

That's a direct application of Hess law.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top