Which Phase Can Withstand a Force?

  • Thread starter Thread starter spark693
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fluids Properties
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on which phase of matter can permanently withstand a perpendicular force, with the consensus that all phases—gas, liquid, and solid—can do so under certain conditions. While gases are more compressible than liquids and solids, they still transmit forces to their containers when compressed. The concept of "withstanding a force" involves the ability of molecules to transmit force through compression, regardless of the phase. It is noted that in practical applications, gases, liquids, and solids are often treated as incompressible for simplification in calculations. Ultimately, all matter must be able to withstand forces to maintain structural integrity.
spark693
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Which of the following phases is capable of permanently withstanding a force perpendicular to its surface?

A. Gas
B. Liquid
C. Solid
D. All of the above

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I understand that the answer is D.
However, what does it mean to withstand a force? if a gas is in a cylinder with a moveable piston, and then a mass is placed on the piston, the gas would be compressed. So I'm not sure what an example of a gas withstanding a perpendicular force would be.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, technically all matter is and must be "compressed" in order to withstand a force. The molecules in a substance (whatever physical state it is in) need to transmit the force down to it's container or supports. This is achieved by squeezing the molecules closer together since the repulsive force between atoms increases as they get closer together.

A gas is just more compressible than a liquid which in turn is more compressible than a solid. Sometimes to simplify the mathematics we assume a gas or liquid or solid is "incompressible" which simply means that the change in volume is small enough that we can safely neglect it without losing accuracy.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top