Which Reactions Are Redox?

  • Thread starter Thread starter terryds
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reactions Redox
AI Thread Summary
Reactions 1, 2, and 3 are identified as redox reactions due to changes in oxidation states, while reaction 4 is not considered redox because there is no change in the oxidation number of sulfur. In reaction 4, sulfur maintains an oxidation state of +4 before and after the reaction. The discussion highlights the importance of tracking oxidation states to determine redox characteristics. Participants clarify the criteria for identifying redox reactions, emphasizing the necessity of oxidation number changes. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately classifying chemical reactions.
terryds
Messages
392
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



Determine which is/are redox reaction/s ?
##1. 2HNO_2 + 2HBr \rightarrow 2NO + BR_2 + 2H_2O##
##2. PbO_2 + SO_2 \rightarrow PbO + SO_3##
##3. 2Ag + Cl_2 \rightarrow 2AgCl##
##4. SO_2 + NaOH \rightarrow NaHSO_3##

Homework Equations


Redox reactions are the ones which involves changes in oxidation numbers

The Attempt at a Solution



Since all reactions involves change in oxidation number
1. Br
2. Pb
3. Cl
4. S

I think all the reactions are redox.
But, the answer is just reaction 1, 2, and 3

Please tell me why reaction 4 is not redox reaction
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the oxidation number of S before the reaction? After the reaction?
 
Borek said:
What is the oxidation number of S before the reaction? After the reaction?

Hmm... it's +4 and +4... No change... Thankss... I missed it
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top