Schools Which School Should I Choose: Waterloo or UofT for Mathematical Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsfreaktor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Schools
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on choosing between the University of Waterloo (UW) and the University of Toronto (U of T) for a major in physics with a specialization in mathematical physics. Participants highlight that UW offers a friendlier environment and more summer course options due to its co-op program, making it an appealing choice. Concerns are raised about U of T's program being overly focused on pure mathematics, which may not align with the interests of all physics students. The importance of GPA and reference letters for graduate school admissions is emphasized, suggesting that the reputation of the school may be less critical for undergraduates. Personal experiences indicate satisfaction with UW, while some express regret about choosing U of T. The discussion also notes differences in the mathematical physics curriculum between faculties at UW, with the math faculty focusing more on math and computer science, while the science faculty includes more labs and science courses. Overall, the decision should consider personal preferences regarding city life, university size, and specific program details.
physicsfreaktor
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I've been accepted to waterloo and uoft, but can't decide between the two. I plan on majoring in physics and both schools have an option for specialization in mathematical physics. Anyone one have any ideas on which is ultimately the better school?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Definitely UW, the environment and people are more friendlier there, and they have more courses during the summer due to the co-op students.

U of T's "Mathematics and Physics Specialist" program has too much emphasis on pure math, you will be taking subjects that only mathematicians and the hardest-core theoretical physicists care about.

I really regret going to U of T, should have gone to UW instead. Who cares about the "reputation", at least for undergraduate. Here in Canada the two most important things to get into grad school are GPA and reference letters. Doesnt matter how hard your program was or what you got on your GREs. So go to UW.
 
In my opinion, both are very good schools, and you will receive a top notch education wherever you go. I think in the end, your choice should depend on details like which city you prefer to live in, university size, whether you're interested in UW's co-op, etc.

I'm headed for UW this September into the math faculty myself, and although I'm happy with my decision, in retrospect, I probably should have looked around more in terms of universities. I didn't even apply to UofT.

By the way, are you talking about choosing schools for September? I thought OUAC needed you to make this decision back in June for the upcomming semester.

Oh, and on a passing note, there's a bit of a difference between faculties in UW's mathematical physics program. If you're going through the math faculty, you'll focus more on math/CS classes alongside with your physics classes whereas the mathematical physics program through the science faculty will involve more labs and other science courses as opposed to math. Although, I was looking through the first year classes, and for the most part, they looked the same no matter which faculty you were in, so I'd imagine that it wouldn't be too hard to switch faculties after first year, assuming that you're sticking to the mathematical physics major.

cheers
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
9K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top