Which Speed Calculation Method Is Best: DV/DR or V/R?

  • Thread starter Thread starter anmolnanda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the appropriate methods for calculating speed, specifically comparing dv/dr and v/r. It emphasizes that speed, defined as ds/dt, requires careful consideration of whether velocity is constant or variable. For constant velocities, v/r is suitable, while dv/dr is appropriate when dealing with distance and time. The conversation highlights the importance of clarity in posing questions to avoid confusion in responses. Ultimately, the choice between these methods depends on the specific context of the problem being addressed.
anmolnanda
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
in some cases we use dv/dr to find speed and in some cases we use v/r which 1 will be more appropriate to use?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anmolnanda said:
in some cases we use dv/dr to find speed and in some cases we use v/r which 1 will be more appropriate to use?

Er.. you can't use either one!

Speed, or velocity, is defined as ds/dt, where s is displacement. If speed is constant, then finding the total net displacement S, over a period of time T, will give you v = S/T (for v constant). If v isn't constant, then the instantaneous you use ds/dt at a particular time t.

Zz.
 
What are v and r? If they are distance and time , then dv/dr is the appropriate quantity. v/r will work for constant velocities only.
However if v and r represent velocity and displacement and you are talking about angular velocity then v/r is the correct quantity.
 
Very good point.

Consider this as a lesson, especially to new members, that if you neglect to present your question clearly and completely, you'll not only cause confusion, but also get confusing responses. If you wish that people who respond to your queries put in some effort and thought into presenting a response that is clear and well-thought out, then it is imperative that YOU do the same as well!

Zz.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top