Which Statistical Test to Use for Ecology Lab Report on Bird Diversity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fatima_a
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Test
AI Thread Summary
For the ecology lab report on bird diversity, the hypothesis suggests that bird diversity is greater in disturbed areas compared to woodlots. The averages and standard deviations for both environments indicate a significant difference, with disturbed areas showing higher diversity. To determine the appropriate statistical test, it's important to clarify the data collection method, which involved observational counts rather than continuous data. Given the nature of the data, nonparametric statistics may be more suitable than a t-test. Proper statistical analysis should focus on disproving the hypothesis to validate the findings.
fatima_a
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
so this is for my lab report for ecology. i need to have a figure showing at least 1 stat test.

the hypothesis i am trying to prove is that diversity of birds will be greater in disturbed areas (like with human influence) compared to woodlot (like forest and such)


from the data

average disturbed = 21.66666667
standard deviation =6.027713773

average woodlot = 10.6
standard deviation = 3.361547263

i just can't seem to figure out whether i need to use a t test or correlation. please help it would be greatly appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to explain more about how the data were collected in order to get assistance finding the right statistical test. At first glance, it sounds like you're probably collecting your data as integers, not continuous data, so will likely need to use nonparametric statistics, not a t-test.

And, to use statistics appropriately, you are trying to DISprove your hypothesis.
 
the data was collected just by observation outside like counting the number of birds you see or the people that walk by.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top