Which table will be more difficult to tilt? ~ PLEASE HELP ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter flabber
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Table Tilt
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining which table shape—triangular, rectangular, or circular—is most difficult to tilt. The center of gravity and the number of legs are critical factors influencing stability. A triangular table is suggested to be the easiest to tip if pushed at a corner, while a circular table may rock on uneven surfaces. A three-legged table is noted as the most stable due to its ability to maintain contact with the ground regardless of floor irregularities. Overall, the stability of each table shape varies based on its design and the conditions under which it is tested.
flabber
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Which table will be more difficult to tilt? ~ PLEASE HELP!?

Hi, I'm very confused to answer this question, please somebody help. I need an exact scientific reason as well. The question goes like:
There are three tables of different shapes: triangular, rectangular and circular. Which one will be more difficult to tilt? and WHY?

I guess it has some relation with the center of gravity or center of mass. Can anyone please clear the concept and help me to answer this question. Thanks a lot in advance...please!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


On the top of my head, it depends on their respective sizes, thicknesses, height, weight, number of legs, exact position of legs, size and shape of legs. It also depend on which direction you plan to tilt.

But assuming everything is rather similar, I'd choose the triangular one as the easiest to tip over, if you push directly on a corner. That way, only the weight of one leg has to leave the ground.
 


It would help if you were a bit more specific in your question. If you mean which table is most likely to rock, then I would say a table with a circular base. If there were any irregularities in the floor that it is on it would rock. The most stable would be the three legged one since three points define a plane and no matter how irregular the floor was it would have all three legs in contact with the floor.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top