Which Textbook is Best for Self-Studying Condensed Matter Physics?

AI Thread Summary
Self-studying condensed matter physics can be effectively approached using popular textbooks like Kittel and Ashcroft & Mermin (A&M). While Kittel is more affordable and serves as a decent introduction, it may lack clarity, particularly in its 8th edition, which contains some typos not found in the 7th. For those with a background in Quantum Mechanics from Griffiths, Kittel is considered manageable if read carefully, paving the way for a deeper understanding through A&M. Additionally, "Principles of Condensed Matter Physics" by Chaikin & Lubensky is recommended for a more advanced treatment, and "Solid State Physics" by A.J. Dekker is noted for being well-organized and simpler than Kittel. Overall, Kittel is a suitable starting point for self-study, with other texts available for further exploration.
Atomos
Messages
165
Reaction score
0
I wish to self study condensed matter physics. I believe the Kittel and Arschcroft&Mermin are the most popular textbooks. I have read that Kittel is not very clear, however it his half the price of A&M on amazon. Also, my background in Quantum Mechanics comes entirely from Griffiths' intro, and its treatment of periodic potentials and band theory was limited to a simple one dimensional example. Might either of the two textbooks be too advanced for my background in QM? Are there any other good textbooks?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Atomos said:
I wish to self study condensed matter physics. I believe the Kittel and Arschcroft&Mermin are the most popular textbooks. I have read that Kittel is not very clear, however it his half the price of A&M on amazon. Also, my background in Quantum Mechanics comes entirely from Griffiths' intro, and its treatment of periodic potentials and band theory was limited to a simple one dimensional example. Might either of the two textbooks be too advanced for my background in QM? Are there any other good textbooks?

coincidentally, i spent today perusing through omar's elementary solid state physics, and it looks to be pretty good.
 
Kittel is a nice introduction to the subject (and at roughly the right level if you understand quantum mechanics at the level of Griffiths's text) if you read the text carefully and work through every derivation. This is especially true if you're using the 8th edition, as it has some (generally obvious) typos that are not present in the 7th edition. :confused: After a careful reading of Kittel, you will be well prepared to tackle the more sophisticated and general treatment of the same topics in Ashcroft & Mermin. For condensed matter physics beyond the solid state, I believe Principles of Condensed Matter Physics by Chaikin & Lubensky is the standard text.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the input, guys. I will go with Kittel.
 
Atomos said:
I wish to self study condensed matter physics. I believe the Kittel and Arschcroft&Mermin are the most popular textbooks. I have read that Kittel is not very clear, however it his half the price of A&M on amazon. Also, my background in Quantum Mechanics comes entirely from Griffiths' intro, and its treatment of periodic potentials and band theory was limited to a simple one dimensional example. Might either of the two textbooks be too advanced for my background in QM? Are there any other good textbooks?

I really like "Principles of Condensed Matter Physics" by Chaikin and Lubensky.
 
you could try out a.j.dekker, solid state physics... simple but good and more organised than kittel...
 
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top