Whirling Rope - Find the Tension at Position r

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the tension in a uniform rope of mass M and length L that is pivoted and whirling with uniform velocity ω, specifically at a distance r from the pivot. Participants clarify that the tension at point r is related to the centripetal force required for the portion of the rope beyond r. The mass of the rope segment beyond r is expressed as m = μ(L - r), where μ is the mass per unit length. The conversation emphasizes the need to integrate the forces acting on the rope to determine the correct expression for tension, highlighting the importance of understanding the contributions from both segments of the rope. Ultimately, the participants conclude that the tension at r is influenced by the mass of the rope beyond that point, leading to a clearer understanding of the problem.
Astrum
Messages
269
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


A uniform rope of mass M and length L is pivoted at on point and whirls with uniform velocity ω
What is the tension at the rope at r from the pivot point? Neglect gravity.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Centripetal force at r is given by -mr \omega^{2}\hat{r}

I don't know where to go from here, some pointers might be nice.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The tension in the rope supplies the centripetal force for the part of the rope beyond r.
 
Yes, but that doesn't really help me. I have no idea how to set this up mathematically.

What's the first step? tension is equal to centripetal acceleration here. centripetal force is equal to -mrω^2

We need to find m, at point r. If you divide the rope into infinitely many pieces, m will equal 0 for point r, so that's not the right way.
 
Astrum said:
Yes, but that doesn't really help me.
It means you have to add up (i.e. integrate) all the forces for all the dr elements of the rope beyond r.
 
μ = M/L - mass per unit length

∴ m = μ (L-r)
 
Basic_Physics said:
μ = M/L - mass per unit length

∴ m = μ (L-r)

How is that useful?
 
The mass is the only unknown quantity.
 
Basic_Physics said:
The mass is the only unknown quantity.
The rope as a whole is mass M. You've given the formula for the mass beyond a given radius, but how are you proposing to turn that into an expression for the tension at a given radius?
 
The tension in the rope supplies the centripetal force for the part of the rope beyond r.
 
  • #10
Basic_Physics said:
The tension in the rope supplies the centripetal force for the part of the rope beyond r.
Sure, but it's not quite trivial to get that from the mass of that portion. Seems to me that it's easier to do the right integral in the first place.
 
  • #11
So, I believe I've solved it, not sure WHY it's correct.

I did the following:
m_{r}=\frac{L}{r}m_{t}
v_{c}=r\dot{\theta}\hat{\theta}=L\dot{\theta}= \omega

Now we have the following function for centripetal force on r: -\frac{L}{r}m(r\frac{\omega}{L})^{2}

Because the centripetal force is a function of r, we integrate with respect to r and get: -m\frac{(\omega)^{2}r^{2}}{2L}

My book got the same answer, but through a way that I don't get. Is this approach bad, or incorrect?

And why exactly is the centripetal force at r not equal to: -\frac{L}{r}m(r\frac{\omega}{L})^{2}
 
  • #12
Astrum said:
m_{r}=\frac{L}{r}m_{t}
v_{c}=r\dot{\theta}\hat{\theta}=L\dot{\theta}= \omega

Now we have the following function for centripetal force on r: -\frac{L}{r}m(r\frac{\omega}{L})^{2}
I can't follow that logic because I don't know what all your variables mean, but you ended up with the right expression for the centripetal force required for an element dr at radius r (except that you left out the dr itself).
Because the centripetal force is a function of r, we integrate with respect to r and get: -m\frac{(\omega)^{2}r^{2}}{2L}
That cannot be right since it reaches max magnitude at the far end of the rope. You've left out the constant of integration.
And why exactly is the centripetal force at r not equal to: -\frac{L}{r}m(r\frac{\omega}{L})^{2}
Why do you think it should be that? (You've left out a distance factor somewhere; dimensionally that would be MT-2).
 
  • #13
haruspex said:
I can't follow that logic because I don't know what all your variables mean, but you ended up with the right expression for the centripetal force required for an element dr at radius r (except that you left out the dr itself).

That cannot be right since it reaches max magnitude at the far end of the rope. You've left out the constant of integration.

Why do you think it should be that? (You've left out a distance factor somewhere; dimensionally that would be MT-2).

Pull out all the constants and integrate.

-m\frac{\omega^{2}}{L}\int r dr

= -m\frac{(\omega)^{2}r^{2}}{2L}

From what I understand, the final function should be the centripetal force of all pieces of the rope up to, and including, r.

-\frac{L}{r}m(r\frac{\omega}{L})^{2} - I thought this might be the centripetal force for r, because it has the same form as the general equation for centripetal force in polar coordinates, which is (if motion is only in the \hat{\theta} direction: \vec{F}_{c}=m(r(\frac{d \theta}{dt})^{2}\hat{\theta})
 
  • #14
Astrum said:
-m\frac{\omega^{2}}{L}\int r dr
What is the range of that integral?
From what I understand, the final function should be the centripetal force of all pieces of the rope up to, and including, r.
No, from r and beyond.
-\frac{L}{r}m(r\frac{\omega}{L})^{2} - I thought this might be the centripetal force for r
It cannot be because it is dimensionally wrong. Where does 1/r in front come from?
 
  • #15
haruspex said:
What is the range of that integral?

No, from r and beyond.

It cannot be because it is dimensionally wrong. Where does 1/r in front come from?

Sorry, the code was acting funny, the range is [r,o], so the constants cancel, and we're left with:

-m\frac{(\omega)^{2}r^{2}}{2L}, is that not so?

And why do you say it's the force from r and beyond? We're only adding up the pieces to r.

The (1/r) came from rearranging the equation for mass, as a function of radius.

\frac{r}{L}M=m, I made M in terms of small m (big M is the total mass, small m is the mass from 0 to r).
 
  • #16
Astrum said:
Sorry, the code was acting funny, the range is [r,o], so the constants cancel, and we're left with:

-m\frac{(\omega)^{2}r^{2}}{2L}, is that not so?

And why do you say it's the force from r and beyond? We're only adding up the pieces to r.
I assume you are measuring r from the fixed end of the rope, i.e. the centre of rotation. What contributes to the tension at that point - the rope at radius < r or the rope at radius > r?
 
  • #17
haruspex said:
I assume you are measuring r from the fixed end of the rope, i.e. the centre of rotation. What contributes to the tension at that point - the rope at radius < r or the rope at radius > r?

At the point r, all the force is from r<, ah, I think I get it.

The question is asking the force AT r that is from the REST of the rope?
 
  • #18
Astrum said:
At the point r, all the force is from r<, ah, I think I get it.

The question is asking the force AT r that is from the REST of the rope?

Exactly.
 
Back
Top