Who Are the Hottest Actors Under 40?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DanP
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the creation of a thread for women under 40, contrasting it with a previous thread for women over 40. Participants express concerns that the under 40 thread may devolve into a superficial "hot chicks" discussion, lacking depth and novelty. Some argue that appreciating beauty is not incompatible with being intelligent, while others criticize the idea as bland and unsophisticated. The debate touches on the standards of the forum, with some feeling that a focus on younger women is less meaningful than discussing older women who may have more to offer in terms of life experience. There is also a mention of the acceptance of adult film stars, with opinions varying on the appropriateness of discussing them in the context of the forum. Overall, the conversation reflects differing views on the value of aesthetic appreciation versus intellectual discourse within the community.
DanP
Messages
114
Reaction score
1
To complement the over 40 thread.


Jessica Biel

[PLAIN]http://celebritiesgossip.files.wordpress.com/2007/07/jessica-biel.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Rosario Dawson
[PLAIN]http://www.comicbookmovie.com/images/users/uploads/8073/rosariodawson2.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Over 40 was more interesting. Under 40 there are just too many to list. It's just going to basically be a "hot chicks" thread.
 
leroyjenkens said:
It's just going to basically be a "hot chicks" thread.
I don't see the problem. And it happens that way because apparently the ladies are too embarrassed to post "hot hunks"*, and Arildno seems to be missing or something.

*or they are attempting to protect our fragile male egos, such dears.
 
I don't see the problem.
It's just a bland idea. There's nothing novel about it. And it seems a little below standards for the forum. Seriously, a hot chicks thread? Isn't this supposed to be where the smart people of the internet come to? Aside from me of course.
 
leroyjenkens said:
It's just a bland idea. There's nothing novel about it. And it seems a little below standards for the forum. Seriously, a hot chicks thread? Isn't this supposed to be where the smart people of the internet come to? Aside from me of course.

Whats novel about chicks over 40 ? So chick over 40 are fitting the standard of the forum, and those under 40 are not ?

Seriously, get over it.
 
Last edited:
leroyjenkens said:
It's just a bland idea. There's nothing novel about it. And it seems a little below standards for the forum. Seriously, a hot chicks thread? Isn't this supposed to be where the smart people of the internet come to? Aside from me of course.

"Smart people" appreciate good looks too. Its not like we are posting our favourite porn stars or something.


And if it was subpar for the forum then it could have easily disappeared with no one else posting in it but now we have three of our most hardheaded arguers in here discussing it. ;-p
 
TheStatutoryApe said:
"Smart people" appreciate good looks too.

Yes smart ppl do. Bigots and frustrated humans aint :P

Partially unrelated, but IIRC Feynman was pretty much into strippers , some of those being also stars in XXX movies. His passion for strippers is well documented at least.

TheStatutoryApe said:
Its not like we are posting our favourite porn stars or something.

Not that would be anything wrong with posting porn stars. As long posting pictures of them obey PG-13. There is nothing wrong with a women who chooses to enter into porn.
 
DanP said:
Whats novel about chicks over 40 ? So chick over 40 are fitting the standard of the forum, and those under 40 are not ?

Seriously, get over it.

It's novel because I've never seen it done before. And the other thread also had a back-story for the reason it was created.
Having just simply a "hot chicks" thread seems trashy and unsophisticated. But that's just me.
Get over it? Get over what? I'm stating my opinion. Should I get over my opinion?
There is nothing wrong with a women who chooses to enter into porn.
I'm sure there's something wrong with a lot of them.
 
  • #10
leroyjenkens said:
It's novel because I've never seen it done before. And the other thread also had a back-story for the reason it was created.
Having just simply a "hot chicks" thread seems trashy and unsophisticated. But that's just me.
Get over it? Get over what? I'm stating my opinion. Should I get over my opinion?

I'm sure there's something wrong with a lot of them.

Like I said,get over it. Post a hot chick's picture or open a new thread where you critic this one.
 
  • #11
DanP said:
Like I said,get over it. Post a hot chick's picture or open a new thread where you critic this one.

I still don't know what I'm supposed to get over.
 
  • #12
leroyjenkens said:
I still don't know what I'm supposed to get over.

Your imaginary "sophistication". If you are unable to conform to the subject, leave the thread.
 
  • #13
DanP said:
Your imaginary "sophistication". If you are unable to conform to the subject, leave the thread.

But you told me to get over it before I mentioned "sophistication". So you must have been referring to something else when you said that.
 
Back
Top