B Who drew the first model of the atom?

Does anybody know who first drew (not just described but actually drew, even roughly) a model of the atom like the one below, and when:
rutherford-atom-for-carbon_lg.jpg

I'd appreciate it if anybody can point me to an evidence.
 

Attachments

Last edited by a moderator:

PeroK

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2018 Award
8,635
3,088
Have you searched the Internet for "History of the Atom"?
 
I was hoping someone could point me to sketches like these:
bohr sketch 1.jpg
bohr sketch 2.jpg

I was told these were sketches done by Bohr but it doesn't quite look like the image I was looking for (the one I posted earlier.) It's a very ubiquitous picture. I see it in almost every logo that has something to do with science. But I can't figure out who really first drew that picture. Was it Bohr? Or Rutherford? Or maybe someone else?
 

Attachments

russ_watters

Mentor
17,950
4,448
I I see it in almost every logo that has something to do with science. But I can't figure out who really first drew that picture. Was it Bohr? Or Rutherford? Or maybe someone else?
I think it *is* just a logo, based on that Bohr sketch on the right.
 
Like the PF logo... :wink:
Hahaha! Thanks for pointing that out. I didn't notice that! :smile:
But, really, I'm curious who made that drawing first and when.
 
But I'm also pretty sure @Greg Bernhardt is too young to have done it first. :rolleyes:
The first scientist to have a glimpse of the true nature of the atoms was Rutherford. In his experiments (called the Geiger-Mardsen experiments) in 1908, when using golden foils and alpha particles he was able to determine the localization of the positive part of the atom, as the centre of it, and its distance from the electrons or electronic cloud. According to Rutherford, it looked like a mini-solar system, with the negative electrons spinning around the nucleus (positive) like planets around the sun. Bohr refined this system afterwards, to include his energy-level's theory.
 

DrClaude

Mentor
6,383
2,634
I'm also very interested in this question. I wasn't able to find a good source about the history of the that drawing, but I confess I didn't do that much research...

What puzzles me is that the drawing uses ellipses to represent the orbits, while Bohr's orbits are circular. So in a sense, it doesn't correspond to any actual theory that was proposed about the atom.
 
It should be pointed out that your original picture is enormously inaccurate regarding the size of the nucleus. It is drawn about five orders of magnitude bigger than its actual size.
 

marcusl

Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,499
184
What puzzles me is that the drawing uses ellipses to represent the orbits, while Bohr's orbits are circular. So in a sense, it doesn't correspond to any actual theory that was proposed about the atom.
A circle viewed obliquely appears elliptical.
 

jtbell

Mentor
15,193
2,787
What puzzles me is that the drawing uses ellipses to represent the orbits, while Bohr's orbits are circular. So in a sense, it doesn't correspond to any actual theory that was proposed about the atom.
Didn't Sommerfeld's extension of the original Bohr model use elliptical orbits?
 

The Physics Forums Way

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top