Who picks your research topic for a PhD?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between a graduate student and their advisor when selecting a thesis topic, particularly in specialized fields like gravity. The choice of research topic is influenced by the advisor's expertise and willingness to support the student's interests. It's important for students to communicate their interests while being mindful of their advisor's focus, as this can help refine a potentially broad topic into a more manageable one. Additionally, students should remain proactive in ensuring their advisor maintains interest in their work to avoid a lack of support, which could jeopardize graduation. The process of forming a dissertation committee varies by institution, with past experiences highlighting the need for students to consider departmental rules and include diverse expertise in their committee selection.
TomServo
Messages
281
Reaction score
9
For example, if your advisor specializes in gravity, but has a subfield specialty (like Horava-Lifschitz gravity) and most of their papers for the last several years are about that subspecialty, does that mean your thesis research will be about that, or could it be about any gravitational thing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends on what your advisor is willing to sponsor. He needs to put together a dissertation committee at some point and would need to select others qualified to review your work. Selection of topic is done between student and teacher based on the background of both people so don't be afraid to suggest a topic of interest. Also students sometimes select too big of a topic and your advisors experience can help you focus it down to something more manageable.

One thing to be aware of is that some advisors may lose interst in your work and you need to be vigilant there and not fall into the trap of not getting the support you may need otherwise you might not graduate.
 
Thanks.
 
jedishrfu said:
[Your advisor] needs to put together a dissertation committee at some point and would need to select others qualified to review your work.

This may vary at different universities. When I was preparing for Ph.D. candidacy 35+ years ago (while finishing my initial Ph.D. coursework and after having chosen my research field and advisor), I had to round up faculty for my committee myself, after discussing my choices with my advisor. I had to take into account my department's rules for composition of the committee. As I recall, I had to have at least one theorist and one experimentalist, and one person from outside the department.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
958
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top