Why 1 dimensional discrete space?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Discrete Space
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of space being fundamentally 1-dimensional, as proposed by string theory and Loop Quantum Gravity. Proponents argue that 1D entities, like strings, allow for the propagation of vibrations at light speed without violating special relativity. However, questions arise regarding the practical advantages of 1D constructs over higher-dimensional entities, especially since string theory itself requires at least 10 dimensions. The conversation also touches on historical attempts to model particles as point-like entities and the challenges that arise from infinities in cosmological theories. Ultimately, the debate highlights the complexities and implications of dimensionality in theoretical physics.
Eh
Messages
745
Reaction score
0
It seems that the idea of space being made out of some 1 dimensional fundamental entity is popular these days. Not only does string theory propose the structure of space to be 1D loops, but Loop Quantum Gravity proposes a lattice built of similar 1D loops. What is the advantage of this? I know that if you were to shake a string, the vibration would travel down the string at the speed of light, so as to not violate SR and avoid the point particle. But it seems one could apply the same logic to a fundamental loop of 3 dimensions.

So what is the practical benefits of a 1D entity over something of extended dimensions?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Well string theory begat brane theory, where the elements are of higher dimensions.

IIRC, physicists around 1960 tried to develop a field theory in which the electron was a little ball. It didn't work. Apparantly the element has to be "of measure zero" in the relevant space in order for the theory to even approximately converge.
 
One dimension??
From all I can find, String Theory requires at least 10 dimensions, and in some cases more. See one "explanation" at:

http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/gr/public/qg_ss.html

It does remove any necessity for infinities, which I don't believe have any place in Cosmology anyway. Just personal opinion, but I can't buy String Theory either.
 
Last edited:
Maybe next a fractal dimension <1?

In 10 dimensional space, strings are the fundamental 1-D constructs of the string theory.

Also, aren't (quantum) probabilities often composed of singular (0-D) values?
 
Originally posted by Labguy
One dimension??
From all I can find, String Theory requires at least 10 dimensions, and in some cases more.

I'm talking about the strings, which are 1 dimensional entities.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top