Why Am I Not Getting Bands in My Western Blot Experiments?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Selvar123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiments
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on troubleshooting issues with Western blot experiments, specifically related to the use of dCK, TK1, and PCNA antibodies. The user reports initially successful results but has faced five months of unsuccessful attempts to obtain bands for the dCK and TK1 antibodies, with only unsatisfactory results for PCNA. Despite using reagents prepared in the lab, including specific buffers and gel components, and following a detailed protocol for gel preparation, protein loading, and antibody incubation, the user has not achieved the expected results. Suggestions from other forum members include providing more details about the reagents and protocols used, considering the specificity of the antibodies for Western blotting, and exploring alternative antibody suppliers to resolve the issues.
Selvar123
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi Forum,

I have been working with Western blot for a while now. I got beautiful results in the beginning when I started the experiment. Now I am stuck with three more antibodies, which I have been trying for the last 5 months, and not getting any result. I could not get any band at all. I do not know what is going wrong. I took help from people in my lab who at least get bands from my own sample. I felt that there was something wrong with my reagents, but when I changed the reagent, even then I could not get results. Please, is there anybody to help me with my situation.

Thanks
Selvar123
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Hi there Selvar, perhaps if you could outline exactly what reagents, antibodies, protocol etc you are using so that members could get an idea of what is possibly going wrong.
 
Selvar123 said:
I could not get any band at all. I do not know what is going wrong. I took help from people in my lab who at least get bands from my own sample.
What are you saying here? That other people do get bands with your sample and antibody, but you don't?
 
Hi Forum,

Thanks for the reply. I am trying to work with dCK, TK1 and PCNA antibodies. I could not get bands for dcK or TK and the band that I got for PCNA was not satisfactory, the PCNA is supposed to be a strong antibody, but it did not show sharp bands. This was the case with me as well as my colleague.

I use reagents prepared in the laboratory, consisting of tris-HCL buffer (running and transfer buffers), reagents for preparing gels such as 1.5M and 1M tris, 30% acrylamide, sds, 10% fresh APS, TEMED. I prepare 12.5% gel everytime. I load protein according to Bradford assay by plotting the standard curve, so that I have equal concentration of protein in each well.

Once I load the gel, I run it for 45 minutes and put it for transfer in cold room for 2 hours. I block the membranes with 5% non fat milk for an hour and incubate it overnight with primary antibody. the next morning, I wash the membrane 3 times and incubate with secondary antibody for 1 hour. I would wash the membrane several times and place it in ECL 1:1 diluted. Then, I would take the membrane for filming.

I DO NOT do the coomassie stain.

I hope this would help people to help me to troubleshoot. Please suggest if any other information is needed.

Thanks
 
Selvar123 said:
the PCNA is supposed to be a strong antibody

How do you know this? Sometimes antibodies that work for one purpose (e.g. immunofluorescence) do not work well for other purposes (like western blotting). Are there antibodies from other suppliers that you can try?
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Back
Top