Why Am I Struggling with Sin and Cos Problems Before My Math Exam?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Warwick
  • Start date Start date
Warwick
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I'm doing a review for my math class and came upon some that I cannot figure out.I don't know why I cannot get the right answer. I know all the rules, I've had tests on this stuff and received A's but these are different for some reason and I don't know why. If anyone can do even one of them I would so greatly appreciate it! my exam is tomarrow :cry: thanks




let sin(x)=5/13, cos(x)=12/13, sin(y)=4/5 and y is in Quadrant II and 0<or=to x <2pi

81. sin(x-y)=____

83. sin 2x =___

84. sin x/2 =___

now the rules above don't apply to these below

85. sin(pheta)=2/3 and 0<pheta<90 then cos2(pheta)=___

86.sin(2cos^-1(1/4))=___
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
1.
Determine the cosine value of y:
You are given that y is in Quadrant 2, which means that the cosine value of y is negative (Agreed?)

In order to determine the cosine value of y, use the fundamental identity:
\cos^{2}y+\sin^{2}y=1.
Knowing that the cosine value has to be negative, you should be able to figure out the answer.
2. 81,82,83:
Knowing the summation, double angle, half-angle formulae for the trigonometric functions should now give you the answers.
3.
85:
\sin^{2}\theta=\frac{1-\cos(2\theta)}{2}
4.86:
<br /> \sin(2\phi)=2\sin\phi\cos\phi, \sin\phi=\pm\sqrt{1-\cos^{2}\phi}
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top