Why Are Commercial Jet Windows So Small?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kevinnn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Airplane Windows
AI Thread Summary
Commercial jet windows are designed to be small primarily to withstand pressure differences, as smaller windows experience less force due to pressure changes. This design helps mitigate rapid decompression in case of a window breach, allowing pilots more time to descend to safer altitudes. Additionally, the structural integrity of the aircraft is enhanced by smaller windows, which reduces the risk of failure under stress. The discussion also draws parallels to construction principles, highlighting the importance of beam bending and load distribution in aircraft design. Overall, the size of jet windows is a critical safety and engineering consideration.
kevinnn
Messages
117
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Why are the windows on a commercial jet so small?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I said because the smaller the window the less force that will be applied on it due to pressure differences. But since F=AP and the pressure stays the same the larger the windows are the more force they would be susceptible to. Is this the correct answer? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are more important considerations than that.
 
Yes I assumed there were. I believe another reason would be so that if a window was compromised the pressure would not drop in the airplane that fast because the air would have to escape out of a smaller area and the pilot would be able to get to lower altitudes in time. If the windows were large te pressure would change too quickly for the pilot to get to a safe altitude. Right?
 
Yes, that is a factor, too. I understand that such events have caused the loss of some planes in the past. But there is still a bigger issue. Have you ever seen a house being built?
 
Try thinking of it in terms of beam bending under a uniformly distributed load. The airplane is the analogous problem for a plate.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top