Why are confetti pieces clogging in my modified confetti blower?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nikola92
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Confetti clogging in the modified blower occurs due to the design of the box and the inlet tube connection. To prevent clogs, it's suggested to add a smaller diameter tube that connects outside the box to the inlet tube, ensuring it has no bends and aligns properly. This modification aims to maintain airflow and create turbulence, which helps mix the confetti with the air, preventing blockages. Observations from similar setups indicate that maintaining a clear inlet is crucial for smooth operation. Implementing these changes should enhance the functionality of the confetti blower during ceremonies.
nikola92
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello to all the physics folks. I have a question which I think will be a simple one for you guys.
I bought these mini confetti blowers for our church. They suck confetti, which are mainly small shiny rectangular pieces or some rose shaped paper-like material pieces, and blow them to the air.
So ours came with a hose setup to suck the confetti:
L3dzXMM.jpg


I decided to modify it to suck confetti from inside a box like these ones do:
EkE930u.jpg


Here's a sketch of how it looks now with the box I made.
Q5rPvfp.png


What's happening though, the confetti pieces after few seconds form a clog where the box connects with the tube.
pd7ZYFL.png

If I push that clog with my hand, the confetti is sucked in and flows through the tubes and is blown just fine.

I modified my box from the inside like so, but it didn't change anything.
60vn7yW.png

->
F5hzBwr.png


Someone unlike me who actually understands why that is happening, can you explain why clog happens and how would you suggest me to modify my box shape to fix this?Not that the hose setup is bad, it just looks like a modified vacuum cleaner like that and not very pretty to have in ceremonies and we still need a box to put the confetti pieces and the hose into suck the confetti so I thought I could just have the box on the machine itself and make it easier to handle.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I would put a tube that connects directly outside the box (air with no confetti) and align the other end at the inlet tube in the box. This tube should be about half the diameter of the inlet tube and have no bends preferably. It should align with the upper part of the inlet tube and some testing should be done to define if its end should coincide with the end of the inlet tube or be a little inside or outside the inlet tube.

This should make sure that the inlet tube is never clogged by keeping the air moving; Creating some turbulence to help mix the confetti with the air. It should act like leaving the hose on the floor with confetti lying in front of the inlet: The air will always be able to get in the upper part of the hose, sucking in the top layer of confetti.

I saw in an other forum that you said:
Planters, I tried to find any photos / manuals / videos of blowers using boxes, but only found two photos and a video, which aren't very clear but seems like nothing special is in these boxes.
But if you look carefully in the video you linked in that post (at time = 1:00), you'll notice that the operator carefully unblocks the inlet tube before starting the machine. Because your box is angled, this is difficult for you to do but the modification I propose should do something similar.

 
jack action said:
I would put a tube that connects directly outside the box (air with no confetti) and align the other end at the inlet tube in the box. This tube should be about half the diameter of the inlet tube and have no bends preferably. It should align with the upper part of the inlet tube and some testing should be done to define if its end should coincide with the end of the inlet tube or be a little inside or outside the inlet tube.

This should make sure that the inlet tube is never clogged by keeping the air moving; Creating some turbulence to help mix the confetti with the air.
I'm sorry, I don't understand what you're suggesting.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top