Why are delta resonances close in width

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter snorkack
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Delta Width
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The width of Δ resonances is consistently measured between 110 to 120 MeV, with Δ0 and Δ++ differing by an estimated 5 to 9 MeV. Δ+ and Δ0 have two decay options each, while Δ++ and Δ- have only one, suggesting that the latter should decay more slowly. However, symmetry considerations reveal that the decay rates are not equal, as the branching ratios for Δ+ into p+π0 are twice that of n+π+. This results in a more complex understanding of the decay dynamics within the isospin framework.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of baryon resonances and their properties
  • Familiarity with isospin symmetry and representations
  • Knowledge of decay channels and branching ratios
  • Basic concepts of particle physics and strong interactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the decay mechanisms of baryon resonances in particle physics
  • Explore isospin symmetry and its implications in particle interactions
  • Investigate the role of phase space in decay rates
  • Learn about the experimental methods for measuring resonance widths
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, researchers in nuclear physics, and students studying baryon decay processes will benefit from this discussion.

snorkack
Messages
2,388
Reaction score
536
The width of Δ resonances is around 110...120 MeV.
All four of them. With modest differences. The difference in width between Δ0 and Δ++ is estimated from 5 to 9 MeV.
Why?
Δ+ and Δ0 resonances have two options to decay.
Δ+→p+π0
Δ+→n+π+
and correspondingly
Δ0→p+π-
Δ0→n+π0
In contrast, Δ++ and Δ- have only one option each:
Δ++→p+π+
Δ-→n+π-
So, from pure consideration of statistics/phase space, shouldn't Δ++ and Δ- live twice as long as Δ0 and Δ+, with widths of 50...60 MeV range?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are implicitly assuming that Δ+→p+π0 should have the same decay rate as Δ++→p+π+. This is not the case.

You can understand this better from a symmetry point of view. In each case you have a state in an isospin 3/2 representation decaying and so this symmetrises the final state isospin. The Δs decay into a particular isospin combination in the final state, it is just that in the case of the ++ and -, this state is a set of physical states while in the + and 0, the state is a linear combination of the physical states and so when you project out the physical states, each channel obtains a factor of 1/2.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb
Just to put some more detail into it.

The ##\Delta## baryons form an isospin quadruplet, meaning you can transform the ##\Delta## baryons into each other using isospin transformations. At the same time, protons and neutrons form an isospin doublet ##N## while the pions form an isospin triplet ##\pi##. Having a final state containing an ##N## and a ##\pi##, you can have the (strong) decay ##\Delta \to N + \pi## only if isospin is conserved. The representations in the final state are of the form ##2\otimes 3 = 4 \oplus 2##, where the 4-representation occurs when the isospins are parallel and the 2-represenation occurs when the isospins are anti-parallel. Due to isospin conservation, only the decay into the 4-state is allowed. The (normalised) state in the 4-representation with a third component of 1/2 is given by ##(\sqrt 2 (1/2)(0) + (-1/2)(1))/\sqrt 3##. As you can see, this is a state that is a linear combination of ##p+\pi^0## ((1/2)(0)) and ##n+\pi^0## ((-1/2)(1)).

Let me also correct myself, the branching ratios of both channels are not the same. The branching ratio of ##\Delta^+## into ##p+\pi^0## should be twice as large as that into ##n+\pi^+## based on these symmetry arguments. The ##p+\pi^0## partial width is therefore 2/3 of the ##\Delta^{++} \to p + \pi^+## width and the ##n+\pi^+## is 1/3.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K