I Why are delta resonances close in width

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter snorkack
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Delta Width
snorkack
Messages
2,388
Reaction score
536
The width of Δ resonances is around 110...120 MeV.
All four of them. With modest differences. The difference in width between Δ0 and Δ++ is estimated from 5 to 9 MeV.
Why?
Δ+ and Δ0 resonances have two options to decay.
Δ+→p+π0
Δ+→n+π+
and correspondingly
Δ0→p+π-
Δ0→n+π0
In contrast, Δ++ and Δ- have only one option each:
Δ++→p+π+
Δ-→n+π-
So, from pure consideration of statistics/phase space, shouldn't Δ++ and Δ- live twice as long as Δ0 and Δ+, with widths of 50...60 MeV range?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are implicitly assuming that Δ+→p+π0 should have the same decay rate as Δ++→p+π+. This is not the case.

You can understand this better from a symmetry point of view. In each case you have a state in an isospin 3/2 representation decaying and so this symmetrises the final state isospin. The Δs decay into a particular isospin combination in the final state, it is just that in the case of the ++ and -, this state is a set of physical states while in the + and 0, the state is a linear combination of the physical states and so when you project out the physical states, each channel obtains a factor of 1/2.
 
  • Like
Likes mfb
Just to put some more detail into it.

The ##\Delta## baryons form an isospin quadruplet, meaning you can transform the ##\Delta## baryons into each other using isospin transformations. At the same time, protons and neutrons form an isospin doublet ##N## while the pions form an isospin triplet ##\pi##. Having a final state containing an ##N## and a ##\pi##, you can have the (strong) decay ##\Delta \to N + \pi## only if isospin is conserved. The representations in the final state are of the form ##2\otimes 3 = 4 \oplus 2##, where the 4-representation occurs when the isospins are parallel and the 2-represenation occurs when the isospins are anti-parallel. Due to isospin conservation, only the decay into the 4-state is allowed. The (normalised) state in the 4-representation with a third component of 1/2 is given by ##(\sqrt 2 (1/2)(0) + (-1/2)(1))/\sqrt 3##. As you can see, this is a state that is a linear combination of ##p+\pi^0## ((1/2)(0)) and ##n+\pi^0## ((-1/2)(1)).

Let me also correct myself, the branching ratios of both channels are not the same. The branching ratio of ##\Delta^+## into ##p+\pi^0## should be twice as large as that into ##n+\pi^+## based on these symmetry arguments. The ##p+\pi^0## partial width is therefore 2/3 of the ##\Delta^{++} \to p + \pi^+## width and the ##n+\pi^+## is 1/3.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top