Why are different equations giving me different answers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bananahammock
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a car collision, where different equations yield varying acceleration results. The user initially uses two equations to calculate acceleration, resulting in -111.11 m/s² and -5.56 m/s², leading to confusion about the discrepancies. It is clarified that the second equation requires squaring the initial and final velocities, which the user overlooked. The importance of correctly applying the equations of motion is emphasized, particularly in understanding their derivation and context. Ultimately, the user recognizes the need to adhere to the correct formula for consistent results.
Bananahammock
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"3. A car traveling 20 m/sec [fwd] is involved in a collision and stops over a distance of 1.8 meters. (This is a comparatively calm collision.)
a) What is the acceleration of the car during this collision?
b) What force is necessary to hold a 70 kg adult in her seat during the collision?
c) Assume an adult is wearing her seatbelt and holding a 15 kg child on her lap. What force must the adult exert to hold this child during the collision? Could you exert this large of a force?"
So I see I've been given
v_{1} = 20 m/s
v_{2} = 0 m/s
d = 1.8m

Homework Equations



I have a few equations I could use here, or that I think I could use.
First off I was thinking

d = [(v1+v2)/2] · t
to find t and then using
a = v2 - v1 / t
in order to find a

And then I thought about the
v2 = v1 + 2ad
which I could rearrange into
a = (v2-v1) / 2d

The Attempt at a Solution


I decided to try both.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.8 = [(20)/2] · t
t = 0.18s
so with an average speed of 10m/s it takes 0.18s to go 1.8m
a = (0-20)/0.18
a = -111.11 m/s2
so if it takes 0.18s go to from 20 to 0 m/s the accel it would seem is -111.11m/s2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
and then I tried the other equation
a = (0-20) / 2(1.8)
a = - 5.56 m/s2

I should mention that although I have seen people justify the second equation, I'm still quite iffy about it because it just doesn't make sense to me on its own, whereas the other equations do.

The two answers are pretty different. I ignored sigfigs throughout this because I didn't think it was entirely relevant to my problem. So what's going on here? I'm sure I screwed up somewhere, somehow.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind. The formula sheet I was given is wrong. Both v1 and v2 in the second part should be ^2 according to what I've googled...
 
Yup. Equation of motion. Usually remembered as..

V2=U2+2as

solve for "a" remembering to think about the sign.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top