Why are electrons located so far from an atom's nucleus?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mia5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Orbit
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of why electrons are located at significant distances from an atom's nucleus. Participants explore various perspectives, including classical analogies, quantum mechanics, and the relative sizes of atomic components.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference Ernst Rutherford's analogy of electrons orbiting the nucleus like planets around the sun, suggesting a balance between attractive and centrifugal forces.
  • One participant questions the definition of "so far away," arguing that a few Angstroms may not be considered far in relative terms.
  • Another participant counters that the distance from the nucleus to the electron is approximately 10^5 times the size of the nucleus, which could be interpreted as 'far away'.
  • Some argue that the perception of distance could be subjective, suggesting that the nucleus might be considered too small rather than the electron being too far away.
  • Participants discuss the implications of quantum mechanics, noting that the wave nature of electrons establishes a minimum likely distance for their position, represented by probability density functions.
  • One participant mentions that the light mass of the electron and the weak electromagnetic interaction contribute to larger expectation values for the distance from the nucleus.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the concept of distance in atomic structure, with no consensus on whether electrons are "far away" from the nucleus. The discussion includes subjective interpretations and varying explanations based on classical and quantum perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Limitations in the discussion include the subjective nature of distance perception, dependence on definitions of "far away," and the unresolved complexities of quantum mechanics in relation to atomic structure.

mia5
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Why are the electrons so far away from the nucleus of an atom ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One time Ernst Rutherford said that that the rotation of electrons around the nucleus like the rotation of the planets around the sun , so the attraction force that made the planets rotate around the sun but wasn't enough to make these planets stick to the sun due to the centrifugal force . The same in the atom , there is an equality between the attractive force and the centrifugal force ( because the nucleus is positive and the electrons are negative )
 
mia5 said:
Why are the electrons so far away from the nucleus of an atom ?

What do you consider to be "so far away"? I'd say that a few Angstroms as not be far away at all!

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
What do you consider to be "so far away"? I'd say that a few Angstroms as not be far away at all!

Zz.
The distance from the nucleus to the electron ( in this basic picture of atoms !) is about 10^5 times the size of the nucleus. Would you not call this 'far away' relatively speaking?
 
technician said:
The distance from the nucleus to the electron ( in this basic picture of atoms !) is about 10^5 times the size of the nucleus. Would you not call this 'far away' relatively speaking?

Nope, because:

1. I could consider that it is the nucleus that is too small, rather than the electron being too far away,

2. The electron actually DOES get quite close to the nucleus. Look at the spread in position for the 1s orbital, for example.

Zz.
 
Is the Earth far away from the Sun because the Sun is 'too small'?
 
technician said:
Is the Earth far away from the Sun because the Sun is 'too small'?

The sun isn't far away. Its by far the closest star to the Earth there is. Its so close that it appears as a disk rather than a point in the sky. :-p
 
technician said:
Is the Earth far away from the Sun because the Sun is 'too small'?

You obviously miss the whole point of my question to the OP and my reply to you. A question that is simply based on "is it too far away" is subjective! I illustrated that by countering that it could be too small. Who is to say which is "correct"? This then renders the question simply a matter of personal taste, rather than based on physics.

I noticed to neglected the second part of my response, which actually HAS a physics content.

Zz.
 
OP could be speaking relatively.If someone enlarges an atom to the size of the earth, the electron should be much far away than the moon
 
  • #10
The reason for the spacings inside an atom are based on Quantum Mechanics, I think. The wave nature of the bound electron gives a minimum likely distance for it to be found 'in orbit' (the probability density function).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #11
The electron is light (as in: not heavy) relative to the nucleons, and the electromagnetic interaction is weak. Both effects lead to large expectation values for the distance, and both have no known deeper reason.
 
  • #12
technician said:
The distance from the nucleus to the electron ( in this basic picture of atoms !) is about 10^5 times the size of the nucleus. Would you not call this 'far away' relatively speaking?
yeah. It is (loosely speaking) because the electromagnetic coupling constant is much smaller than the coupling constant of the strong force. Also, as mfb said, the mass of the electron is smaller than the mass of the nucleons.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
36K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K