Why are fermion states anti-symmetric under exchange operator?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LCSphysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particles System
LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
Let ##L## be the state space of two identical/indistinguishable particles. Let ##L \otimes L## be the state space of the combined system formed by both particle.

If the particles were distinguishable, ##LxL## would have four mutually orthogonal states: ## |\phi\rangle|\phi\rangle, |\omega\rangle|\omega\rangle, |\phi\rangle|\omega\rangle, |\omega\rangle|\phi\rangle ##.

But, if the particles are bosons, we have actually three states: ## |\phi\rangle|\phi\rangle, |\omega\rangle|\omega\rangle, |\omega\rangle|\phi\rangle + |\phi\rangle|\omega\rangle##

My question is for the fermions case, the only state would be ## |\omega\rangle|\phi\rangle - |\phi\rangle|\omega\rangle##

But i can not understand why. (I think i understand the signal, it is because system of fermions are anti symmetric under exchange operator, right?)

OBS (This is being used in the book to introduce/derive the Pauli exclusion, so it is not a good idea to answer "because Pauli exclusion (...)")
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LCSphysicist said:
But i can not understand why. (I think i understand the signal, it is because system of fermions are anti symmetric under exchange operator, right?)
Yes. Witin QM the anti-symmetry of mutiple fermion states is taken as an axiom/law of nature. It can be derived within QFT.

Symmetry and anti-symmetry laws of nature tend to dominate particle physics. For example, it's local-gauge invariance (a form of symmetry requirement) that brings together charged particles and the electromagnetic field.

You should start to see these symmetry axioms in the same light at ##F = ma## and Coulomb's law etc. Fundamental laws that we take as a starting point.
 
  • Like
Likes LCSphysicist
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top