Why Are Half of the Permutations in Sn Even and the Other Half Odd?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tgt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups Parity
tgt
Messages
519
Reaction score
2
How do we know that half of permutations are odd and half are even?

Why not 1/4, 3/4 or other proportions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, I assume you are talking about permutations in a symmetric group.

Fact 1. Every permutation in Sn can be written as a product of transpositions.
Fact 2. A permutation in Sn (n>=2) cannot be both even and odd (number of transpositions).
Fact 3. The set of all even permutations of Sn forms a group, which is called an alternating group of degree n.

What you need to show is the above alternating group is the normal subgroup of Sn of index 2, which can be interpreted as "In Sn, one half of elements is the even permutations and the other half is odd permutations".

Define a map f:S_n \rightarrow C by \sigma \mapsto sgn (\sigma), where C is a multiplicative group {1, -1}.
A "sgn" denotes the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Even_and_odd_permutations" , returns 1 if the permutation is even and -1 if the permutation is odd.

Now, f is surgective by the above definition of sgn and the kernel of f is An, which is normal is Sn.
By the first isomorphism theorem, S_n/A_n \cong C.
Thus, An is a normal subgroup of Sn of index 2, and it is the only subgroup of Sn of index 2 (this can be proven as well).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Working in Sn, define a bijection from An to Bn, where Bn is the set of all odd permutations.

f: An -> Bn
f(x)=yx where y is in Bn

You can easily show this map is a bijection, therefore An and Bn have the same cardinality. So exactly half of the permutations in Sn are even ( and the other half are odd).
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
580
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top