Why are metals more dense than non-metals?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dolimitless
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metals
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the factors influencing the density of metals compared to non-metals. It highlights that metallic bonding plays a significant role, but other aspects such as nuclear mass and the presence of d-orbitals also contribute. Transition metals, particularly in group 9, are noted for their higher densities compared to non-metals in the same periods. The discussion emphasizes that alkali and alkaline Earth metals are generally lighter than solid non-metals in their respective periods.The ability of metals to form dense, single-element crystals is contrasted with non-metals, which typically form less dense structures, often as ionic solids. Additionally, the impact of special relativity on orbital contraction in heavier elements is mentioned, explaining how increased nuclear charge affects electron behavior and atomic size. Overall, while atomic weight largely determines metal density, the comparison with non-metals involves multiple factors, including bonding characteristics and crystal structure.
dolimitless
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Im guessing it's something to do with their metallic bonding of sorts?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
That is often the case, but not always. Compare the densities of lithium, sodium, or even cesium to the densities of bromine and iodine, for instance.

One thing to look at is the periodic table. If you draw a line that separates the metals from the nonmetals, which side of that line do the metals fall on?
 
Look at this - http://www.webelements.com/periodicity/density/ - for elements that are solid or liquid at room temperature.

Bonding plays role, but so does the nuclear (atomic) mass and the adding of d-orbitals rather than p-orbitals. Some of transition metals are denser than non-metals in the same period, with group 9 being the densest in periods 4, 5 and 6. The alkali and alkaline Earth elements, groups 1 and 2, are lighter than the solid non-metals in their respective periods.
 
There's a bunch of reasons.

Yes, metal-metal bonds in metal crystals (which is what you mean by 'a metal' in everday speech) are relatively short. This is related to another factor, which is that since metals have d-orbitals as their valence shell, they're smaller - d orbitals are small. (by whatever measure you use to define the radius of an atom, there's no agreed-upon one) By comparison, s-orbitals are quite big, which is why lithium is very light - not only does it have a low atomic number, but it's surrounding electron cloud is quite big, relatively speaking.

Another factor is that non-metals can't form the big single-element crystals that metals can. In the few cases they do (S8 for instance) they're not packed as dense. When they form crystals its usually as an ionic solid, which means the have a counter-ion, and again, they can't be packed as dense.

Yet another factor is the contraction of orbitals due to special relativity. As elements get heavier, the increased positive charge of the nucleus causes the innermost (core) electrons to move faster (classical analogue: a planet orbiting more closely to the sun has to move faster to stay in orbit). They move so much faster that the electrons start to pick up relativistic mass - which causes their orbitals to contract (and the others follow suit). So even though heavy metals have lots and lots more electrons, they're not that much bigger. (E.g. Uranium has 3x the number of electrons Chromium does, but only about 10-25% bigger radius, depending on how you measure it)

So metal atoms are all roughly the same size - so the density of metals compared to other metals is mostly dependent on the atomic weight - and you find the heaviest metals (Tungsten, Osmium & co) right near the bottom of the periodic table. But the density of metals compared with non-metals is mostly due to the other factors.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top