MHB Why Are My Logarithmic Equation Solutions Extraneous?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cbarker1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithmic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving the logarithmic equation $\log(2-x) + \log(3-x) = \log(12)$. The user initially finds the solutions $x=2$ and $x=3$, but both are extraneous due to the logarithm of zero being undefined. The correct factorization of the quadratic equation should yield $x^2 - 5x - 6 = (x+1)(x-6)=0$, leading to valid solutions of $x=-1$ and $x=6$. The confusion arises from an error in the factorization step. The correct solution to the logarithmic equation is $x=-1$.
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Solve for x

$\log\left({2-x}\right)+\log\left({3-x}\right)=\log\left({12}\right)$
$\log\left({(2-x)(3-x})\right)=\log\left({12}\right)$
$\left(2-x)\right)\left(3-x)\right)=12$
${x}^{2}-5x-6=0$
$\left(x-2)\right)\left(x-3)\right)=0$
$x=2, x=3$

I have a problem with solutions because both is extraneous.

$\log\left({2-2}\right)+\log\left({3-2}\right)=\log\left({12}\right)$
$\log\left({0}\right)+\log\left({1}\right)=\log\left({12}\right)$
This solution is extraneous as well as the other solution.

The solution in the back of the book is -1.

Where did I made a mistake?Thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Cbarker1 said:
Solve for x

$\log\left({2-x}\right)+\log\left({3-x}\right)=\log\left({12}\right)$
$\log\left({(2-x)(3-x})\right)=\log\left({12}\right)$
$\left(2-x)\right)\left(3-x)\right)=12$
${x}^{2}-5x-6=0$
$\color{red}(x-2)(x-3)=0$
$x=2, x=3$

...

Hello,

I've marked the line where you made a tiny (but fatal) mistake.

After facvtorization you should come out with

$$x^2-5x-6 = (x+1)(x-6)=0$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top