Why are my problems written as sub x and sub 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter hominid
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the notation used in population tables, specifically the use of "sub x" for variables like L_x (survivorship) and m_x (fecundity) in the context of calculating the population replacement rate, R_0. The participant seeks clarification on why R_0 is considered variable despite being expressed as a sum over a range of ages, from x_first to x_last. It is explained that R_0 represents the average number of offspring per individual and can change based on the values of L_x and m_x, which reflect the population's growth rate. The confusion arises from the interpretation of R_0 as a constant when it is actually dependent on the sum of survivorship and fecundity across age groups. Ultimately, R_0 is not constant but varies based on the demographic parameters being analyzed.
hominid
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Why are my problems written as "sub x" and "sub 0"

Homework Statement




I am doing population tables in math where x represents age. L sub x represents survivor ship at age x. m sub x represents fecundity at age x.

My question is, why is x always "sub x"? There is a an equation R_0 = \sum_{x_first}^{x_last} L_x m_x=population-replacement-rate

What I don't understand is how can R_0 be variable. I see that when R_0=1 there is no growth. And my professor said that this allows us to simply say that r=0=no population growth. But I am thoroughly confused
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


I don't know what the term "survivorship at age x" means, but I have a question for you anyway. What is the index of summation? Is x meant to be the index of summation? It is common to use subscripts in that situation. Is it something like

R_0 = \sum_{x=1}^{100} L_x m_x

If so, then R_0 isn't a variable; it is constant.
 


What I said isn't very clear, sorry. I am doing "life tables" on the rates of population changes over time within age groups. e.g., for whatever reason there may be 100K people alive at age 50, and 75K alive at age 49 given the circumstances with their parents at birth, or other factors that affected that age group during their lives that lowered their age group's population vs another. Survivorship at age x l_x is the percentage of people still alive from a sample of people at their given age.

My problem looks just like that without the "100" and x=1. Instead, it has on top, x last, and on bottom, x first. Meaning x first is the age of first reproduction, and x last is the age of last reproduction.

R_0 = \sum_{x_first}^{x_last} l_x m_x

What I don't understand is how could R_0 be a constant if the value for R_0 changes depending on the growth rate. That is, if the sum of l_x and m_x equal one then there is no growth, but if their sum equals 2.5 then we could say that each individual leaves an average of 2.5 offspring, thus population is growing.
 
Last edited:


So R0= lxfirstmxfirst+ lxfirst+1mxfirst+1+ lxfirst+2mxfirst+ 2+ ... + lxlastmxlast[/math]. R0 is not necessarily a constant but it does NOT depend upon a specific vallue of "x" since it is a sum over all values of x.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...

Similar threads

Back
Top