Why are the equations for mean energy in the canonical ensemble equal?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between two equations for mean energy in a canonical ensemble, specifically why they are equal. The first equation is derived from the definition of the canonical partition function Z, which involves the Hamiltonian of the system. The mean energy is expressed as the negative derivative of the logarithm of Z with respect to beta. The connection to temperature is clarified by using the chain rule, leading to the expression that relates changes in beta to changes in temperature. Ultimately, the equality of the two equations is established through proper application of thermodynamic principles and differentiation.
Abigale
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I regard an equation for an canonical ensemble.
I do not understand why both equations should be equal.

\bar{E}= -\frac{ \partial \ln{(Z)}}{ \partial \beta} \overset{\text{?}} = k T ^{2 } \frac{\partial \ln{(Z)}}{\partial T}

Z is a canonical partition function.
\beta = \frac{1}{kT}.
Thx
Abby
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try the chain rule.
 
Do you under stand the first equation? That simply comes from the definition of the partition sum
Z=\mathrm{Tr} \exp(-\beta \hat{H}),
where \hat{H} is the Hamiltnian of the system. The Canonical Statistical Operator is
\hat{R}=\frac{1}{Z} \exp(-\beta \hat{H}).
The mean energy is
\overline{E}=\mathrm{Tr}(\hat{R} \hat{H})=-\frac{1}{Z} \frac{\partial Z}{\partial \beta}=-\frac{\partial \ln Z}{\partial \beta}.
As it turns out by comparing with the first Law of thermodynamics, you have
\beta=\frac{1}{k T},
where T is the temperature (contrary what you've written in your posting!).

Then of course you have for any function of the temperature
\frac{\partial f}{\partial \beta}=\frac{\partial f}{\partial T} \frac{\partial T}{\partial \beta}.
From the above formula you find T=1/(k \beta) and thus
\frac{\partial T}{\partial \beta}=-\frac{1}{k \beta^2}=-k T^2.
This gives
\overline{E}=k T^2\frac{\partial \ln Z}{\partial T}.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Back
Top