Why are there two values of Hy here?

  • Thread starter Thread starter edsoneicc
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of the value of Hy in a static equilibrium problem, where two different methods yield conflicting results. The first calculation using the moment about point H gives Hy as 16.3043, while the second calculation using the moment about point I results in Hy being 66.3043. Participants question the accuracy of the distance used in the calculations, specifically the 3.05 distance, and whether DI is a two-force member. The discrepancy in Hy values suggests a potential error in the setup or assumptions made during the calculations. Clarifying the distances and the nature of the members involved is essential for resolving the conflicting results.
edsoneicc
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



66wumq.jpg


Homework Equations



∑M at H = 0 and ∑M at I = 0
∑Fy = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


Assuming that Iy is positive and Ix is negative; Hy is negative and Hx is positive.

Now I would like to compute for Iy and Hy using
∑M at H = 0 = Iy(2.3) - 50(3.05)
Iy = 66.3043
∑Fy = 0 = -50 + 66.3043 - Hy = 0
Hy = 16.3043

But if I use
∑M at I = 0 = Hy(2.3) - 50(3.05)
Hy = 66.3043

Why do I have different values for Hy?Also, is DI a two force member?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
But if I use
∑M at I = 0 = Hy(2.3) - 50(3.05)
Are you sure about that 3.05 distance?
 
Thread 'Have I solved this structural engineering equation correctly?'
Hi all, I have a structural engineering book from 1979. I am trying to follow it as best as I can. I have come to a formula that calculates the rotations in radians at the rigid joint that requires an iterative procedure. This equation comes in the form of: $$ x_i = \frac {Q_ih_i + Q_{i+1}h_{i+1}}{4K} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i-1} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i+1} $$ Where: ## Q ## is the horizontal storey shear ## h ## is the storey height ## K = (6G_i + C_i + C_{i+1}) ## ## G = \frac {I_g}{h} ## ## C...
Back
Top