Why ball turns when rotated after being kicked.

  • Thread starter Thread starter exquisitenick
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball
AI Thread Summary
A ball spins when kicked due to the foot striking it at an angle, imparting angular momentum. When a spinning ball is in flight, it turns because of the Magnus effect, which results from differing airflow velocities around the ball. This effect is influenced by the ball's characteristics and can lead to various trajectories, such as those seen in table tennis or banana kicks. The discussion references external resources for further explanation of the Magnus effect and its applications. Understanding these principles is crucial for grasping the physics behind ball dynamics in sports.
exquisitenick
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I have an unsolved question of an exam of my University.
The question is why a ball turns, when somebody kicks it by making it to rotate to itself.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lol, doesn't really make sense. If you kick a ball head on ie perpendicular to the ball, then the ball will not spin. Unless there is unequal amounts of drag acting on either side, which is not really possible. The reason why a ball will spin is that the foot does not hit perpendicular to the surface and so give the ball some angular momentum.
 
amppatel said:
lol, doesn't really make sense. If you kick a ball head on ie perpendicular to the ball, then the ball will not spin. Unless there is unequal amounts of drag acting on either side, which is not really possible. The reason why a ball will spin is that the foot does not hit perpendicular to the surface and so give the ball some angular momentum.

That does not even answer the question. The question was, why a spinning ball turns in flight like commonly seen in table tennis or banana kicks.

This is usually attributed to the Magnus effect, which is caused by the airflow, which has a different velocity compared to the center of the ball at both sides of the turning ball. However this also depends on some characteristics of the ball.

It is also described here: http://www.soccerballworld.com/Physics.htm
 
Thank you very much!
 
Interesting side note (at least, I hope it's interesting):

On Mars, the ball would curve http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/mars_curveballs_030221.html" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top