Why be and Mg not chemically inactive

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maroon Ray
  • Start date Start date
Maroon Ray
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Be has 4 electrons, thus the electronic
configuration is 1s2 2s2
Mg has 12 electrons, thus the electronic
configuration is 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2
Both Be and Mg have
closed subshells. Why are they not chemically
inactive (inert)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To be chemically inert, the element needs closed shells, not subshells. Also, in recent years, compounds involving the heavier inert gases (xenon and krypton?) have been formed.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top