Why Can't a Full-Size Thermometer Measure Thimbleful Hot Water Accurately?

  • Thread starter Thread starter spaghetti3451
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermometer
AI Thread Summary
Using a full-size glass thermometer to measure a thimbleful of hot water is inaccurate because the thermometer absorbs a significant amount of thermal energy, altering the water's temperature. Thermal equilibrium must be established, which means the water loses heat to the thermometer, leading to a misleading reading. The specific heat capacity of water is higher than that of the thermometer materials, but the small mass of water results in a larger temperature change. Consequently, the thermometer's reading does not reflect the true temperature of the water. Therefore, using a full-size thermometer in this scenario is not practical for accurate measurements.
spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31

Homework Statement



Explain why it would not make sense to use a full-size glass thermometer to measure the temperature of a thimbleful of hot water.

Homework Equations



Concept of thermal equilibrium

The Attempt at a Solution



When a thermometer is in contact into a thermal system, thermal energy flows from the system to the thermometer or vice-versa until thermal equilibrium is established between the thermometer and the system. In this process, the system gains or loses thermal energy and so the temperature of the system will have changed. Therefore, a thermometer can only accurately measure the temperature of a heat reservoir.

In this case, the full-size glass thermometer absorbs a significant amount of thermal energy from the thimbleful of hot water, so the temperature measured is highly inaccurate.

Can you please check my answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have put it very well. You could also have mentioned relative heat capacities of the water vs. the thermometer.
 
Well, the thermal energy lost by the water equals the thermal energy gained by the thermometer. So, mcΔθ for the water equals mcΔθ for the thermometer. The mass and specific heat capacity of the water are smaller than those for the thermometer. So, the temperature change of the water is much larger compared to the temperature of the water. This implies that the temperature of the water will not be measured accurately.

Is that right? I'm not sure about the magnitude of the specific heat capacity of a mercury-in-tube thermometer, so I am not sure if my answer is fully correct.
 
Excellent! While you bring up a good point - the specific heat of water is among the highest of any known substances - higher than glass or Hg - the low m of the water would more than make up for its high c. So your equation is most appropriate.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top