Why Can't Free Particles Have Negative Energy States in Quantum Mechanics?

Yedi
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Why is there, for a free particle no physical state, i.e, proper wave function, for a negative energy?

Is it because k is imaginary? (k = sqrt(-2mE)/(reduced Planck's constant)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't forget that, for a free particle, the potential energy is implicitly V = 0. Can a free particle exist in a state where its energy E is everywhere in space less than its potential energy? What does the Schrodinger equation have to say about that?
 
Because those states are not normalizable.
 
Dickfore said:
Because those states are not normalizable.
Sure.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top