Why Can't I Get the Same Answer for the Boltzmann Equation Problem?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a calculation involving the relative number of sodium atoms in excited and ground states using a specific equation. The equation incorporates constants such as the number of atoms in each state, energy differences, the Boltzmann constant, and temperature. A sample calculation is provided, showing the steps to derive the energy difference (Ej) from the wavelength of emitted light and subsequently calculating the ratio of excited to ground state atoms (Nj/No). The main issue raised is the inability to replicate the solution's result, despite using the same values. Responses suggest that the calculations appear correct and advise checking for potential input errors in the calculator or misunderstandings regarding scientific notation.
atsum
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Why I can't calculate the same answer as the solution below? I use the value as what the below solution showed.

Q:
Where Nj is the number of atoms in excited state, No is the number of atoms in the
ground state, Pj and Po are constants determined by the number of states having equal
energy at each quantum level, Ej is the energy difference between excited and ground
states, K is the Boltzmann constant, and T is the absolute temperature. To understand
the application of this equation let us consider the situation of sodium atoms in the 3s
state (Po = 2) when excited to the 3p excited state (Pj = 6) at two different
temperatures 2500 and 2510K. Now let us apply the equation to calculate the relative
number of atoms in the ground and excited states:
Usually we use the average of the emission lines from the 3p to 3s where we have two
lines at 589.0 and 589.6 nm which is:

Solution:
λ = (589.0+589.6)/2 = 589.3 nm
Ej = hc/λ
Ej = (6.6256x10-34 J s x 2.998x1010 cm s-1)/{(589.3 nm x (cm/ 107 nm)}
Ej = 3.37x10-19 J
Nj/No = (6/2) exp {(-3.37x10-19 J/(1.38x10-23 J K-1 x 2500 K)}
Nj/No = 1.72x10-4
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
atsum said:
Why I can't calculate the same answer as the solution below? I use the value as what the below solution showed.

Solution:
λ = (589.0+589.6)/2 = 589.3 nm
Ej = hc/λ
Ej = (6.6256x10-34 J s x 2.998x1010 cm s-1)/{(589.3 nm x (cm/ 107 nm)}
Ej = 3.37x10-19 J
Nj/No = (6/2) exp {(-3.37x10-19 J/(1.38x10-23 J K-1 x 2500 K)}
Nj/No = 1.72x10-4

Hard to tell where your problem is, calculations look correct and I got the same result from these numbers. Perhaps you are keying them wrong into calculator, or misunderstanding the notation. 2.998x1010 means 2.998x1010 and probably should be entered as 2.998e10 or something like that - details will depend on what (program, calculator model) you use.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top