Why Can't I Solve for a2 Instead of a1 in Connected Objects Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CVRIV
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding solving for acceleration (a2) instead of (a1) in a connected objects problem. The user initially believes that both a1 and a2 can be expressed interchangeably, but struggles with the signs and direction of acceleration. It is clarified that maintaining consistent signs is crucial, as a positive a1 indicates acceleration towards the edge, while a positive a2 implies downward acceleration, leading to inconsistencies in their relationship. The user realizes that they incorrectly assigned a negative value to a2 from the start, which complicated their calculations. Ultimately, the key takeaway is the importance of consistent direction and polarity when solving such problems.
CVRIV
Messages
12
Reaction score
5
I attached an image of the problem and solution from the book and my attempt at solving it. I don't need help solving the problem the way the book explains it; i understand that.

What I don't understand is why I can't solve for (a2) instead of (a1). The book says a2 = -a1, which makes sense to me, because the magnitudes are the same except the polarity for a2 is negative.

What about a1 = -a2? I tried solving the problem the same way except I substituted -a2 for a1 instead of the other way around and it doesn't work. I just don't understand why it wouldn't work.

Please help me understand this.
 

Attachments

  • Exp 414.jpg
    Exp 414.jpg
    42.6 KB · Views: 346
  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    37.3 KB · Views: 355
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to keep the signs consistent. In your first equation a positive a1 means the mass accelerates towards the edge. In your second equation a positive a2 means the mass accelerates downwards. That is possible - but then you have a1=a2 without the minus sign.
 
Why would positive a2 accelerate downwards? I thought positive a2 accelerates upwards?

In equation 2 I divided both sides by -1 so that I could cancel out the tension T. Was that not right?
 
Oh wow. I think I know what I did wrong. How stupid of me. :confused:
 
CVRIV said:
Why would positive a2 accelerate downwards? I thought positive a2 accelerates upwards?
It is arbitrary which direction you choose, but you have to be consistent.
 
Finally! The problem was that from the very start I was inverting the polarity of m1a2. I kept writing down T - m2g = -m2a2. I did that because I had it in my head that a2 was negative, which it is, but only after solving for a2. By assigning it as negative from the start, I was in fact just screw it all up. Also... I had it stuck in my head that I had to add the two equations together. I went back to the previous problem in the book, which as a Atwood's Machine problem, and it was subtracting the equations. I I thought I was doing it wrong so I told myself I have to subtract the problems. That's when I realized, fully realized, that it totally depended on the cancellation of T. I get it now. Thanks for your help.
 

Attachments

  • 0310190012_2.jpg
    0310190012_2.jpg
    46.4 KB · Views: 339
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top