Why Can't We Compress Water but Can Compress Gas?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Impulse2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Compression
AI Thread Summary
Water is not truly incompressible, but it is nearly so, making it much less compressible than gases. The significant difference in compressibility arises from the greater space between gas molecules compared to liquid molecules. While liquids can be compressed to some extent, the bulk modulus of elasticity indicates that this compression is minimal. Changes in pressure and temperature can affect the distance between molecules, but liquids remain approximately incompressible under normal conditions. Understanding these properties is crucial for accurately solving related scientific problems.
Impulse2
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Excuse my ignorence here but as I understand you cannot compress water. Why not, is there not some space between any molecules, particularly following heating, that would allow compression? Assuming there isn`t then how is it we can compress a pure gas. Is the situation not the same?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gasses are not liquids. Indeed, it's the space between molecules that make the properties of one different from the other.

There is a lot of space between gas molecules compared to liquids. That's why gasses are much more compressible than liquids.
 
Yes, but what is between the gas molecules and for that matter the liquid ones? Are you saying that there is a vacuum and they only partially pack down?
 
Liquid water is compressible, just not a lot. See bulk modulus of elasticity.

As pressure decreases and/or temperature increases then there is more distance between the molecules.

In a hard vacuum like interstellar space there may only be one molecule per cubic centimeter.

Avogadro's Number of water molecules is ~18 grams, the molar volume.
 
Impulse2 said:
Excuse my ignorence here but as I understand you cannot compress water.

As Doug Huffman just said, your understanding is incorrect. Liquids are not truly incompressible, but they are nearly so, and assuming that they follow the idealized behavior makes solving many problems simpler without significantly affecting the results. So, they are "approximately" incompressible, but the approximation is a very good one.

Of course, there are likely situations in which the approximation breaks down. The trick is to recognize those situations, and avoid using the approximation there.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top