Why did Author Use Cosine/Sine for Periodic Sound Waves?

AI Thread Summary
The author uses cosine for the position function of periodic sound waves because it represents the wave's displacement from equilibrium, while sine is used for the pressure variation derived from that displacement. The difference between sine and cosine is a phase shift of 90 degrees, which can affect the starting point of the wave. The choice of cosine initially may have been to ensure the pressure wave is expressed as a sine function, aligning with conventions in wave mechanics. Ultimately, the distinction between sine and cosine is less critical than the reference points chosen for x=0 and t=0. Understanding this phase relationship clarifies the author's approach to describing sound waves.
jwxie
Messages
278
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




I am confused with why the author uses this form for periodic sound waves.

If s(x,t) is the position of a small element relative to is equilibrium position, we can express this harmonic position function as \[s(x,t) = s_{max}cos(kx-wt)\]

Why did he use cosine instead?
Later, he states

The variation in the gas pressure \Delta P\] measured from the equilibrium value is also periodic. For the position function desribed above (in this thread), \Delta P\] is given by

\[\Delta P = \Delta P_{max}sin(kx-wt)\]

Note he uses sin this time.

I know that the difference between sine and cosine is the phase offset, by 90 degrees.

But why did the author uses cosine for the first equation, and use sine in the second?

There must be a reason for this. He has been consistent with sin convention with traveling waves (previous chapter).

---edited----

For the second equation I understood now that it was derived using the first equation, and thus taking the partial s / partial x we get sine instead. So why did he use cos in the beginning, anyway?

I also understand that sound waves is longitudinal wave.

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is a little confusing, but it really doesn't matter whether you use sine or cosine - just a matter of where on the wave you choose x=0 and t=0. Perhaps the author wanted to end up with sine for the pressure wave so he started with cosine for the displacement to achieve that end.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top