Why did Max Planck quantize light?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the motivations behind Max Planck's decision to quantize light, particularly in the context of the blackbody radiation problem and potential connections to the development of more efficient light bulbs. Participants explore historical accounts and differing interpretations of Planck's work and its implications.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that Planck quantized energy to solve the blackbody problem, while others propose that he aimed to improve light bulb efficiency.
  • One participant questions the validity of the claim that Planck was commissioned to study blackbody radiation for light bulb companies, labeling it an urban legend.
  • A later reply references a Stack Exchange thread that also questions the light bulb connection, asserting that Planck's primary focus was on blackbody radiation.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about the historical context of energy efficiency concerns in the 1890s, suggesting that such ideas may not have been prevalent at that time.
  • Some participants note that accurate measurements of blackbody radiation were conducted by researchers at the Physikalisch Technische Reichsanstalt, which had ties to the development of lighting standards.
  • There is mention of the establishment of national metrology institutes around the same time, indicating a broader scientific context for Planck's work.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the motivations behind Planck's quantization of light, with multiple competing views remaining regarding the significance of light bulb efficiency versus the blackbody radiation problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the lack of definitive historical evidence linking Planck's work directly to light bulb efficiency, suggesting that the narrative may be influenced by later interpretations or urban legends.

Zahidur
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I've read up on the history of quantization and I can't seem to find a definitive answer on why Planck actually quantized light. Some sources say that he came up with the idea of energy being quantized in order to solve the blackbody problem, whilst others say that he was trying to create a more efficient light bulb. Which is it or is it both?

Also, if he did quantize energy in the effort of trying to create a better light bulb, how does quantizing light help do that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Zahidur said:
others say that he was trying to create a more efficient light bulb

Can you give a specific reference?
 
Thanks
 
I consider this as a (not very popular) urban legend right away, if not to say simply wrong. It reads like a bad mixture of Planck's and Einstein's vita.
E.g. from Wikipedia "The German Bureau for measures and weights was founded 1946 in the soviet occupied zone ..."
"Founded in 1917 as the Normenausschuß der deutschen Industrie (NADI, "Standardisation Committee of German Industry"), the NADI was renamed Deutscher Normenausschuß (DNA, "German Standardisation Committee") in 1926 to reflect ..."

Moreover, I doubt that the term "German" connected to light bulbs in the 1890's is very accurate. At this time Germany was about 20 years old and I doubt that their concerns were about energy efficiency of light bulbs.

The black body radiation is the correct origin (1900). Planck started to consider heat radiation in the second half of the 1890's and the article claims the first half. In addition it's very unllikely that they had asked such a young person (~35) at the time and not, e.g. Helmholtz.
 
PeterDonis said:
It might be. Here is a fairly recent stack exchange thread that suggests so:

http://hsm.stackexchange.com/questi...mmission-planck-to-study-black-body-radiation

Whether it is or not, though, Planck was certainly trying to solve the black body radiation problem, so the OP's question is not either-or.
My major doubts come from what this "bureau of standards" should have been. And where this rather modern aspect of "saving a few dollars" should have arisen from. Both sounds as it wouldn't fit into the early 1890's. Maybe a small talk at some meeting became a rumor.

Edit: What makes me even more suspicious is that on Google, a search engine that usually finds the absurdest combinations, only finds explanations for kids like "people wondered why light bulbs become yellow whereas iron becomes red" when searched for "Glühbirne+Planck". One would expect that such a legend would appear on German websites. It doesn't.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
fresh_42 said:
My major doubts come from what this "bureau of standards" should have been. And where this rather modern aspect of "saving a few dollars" should have arisen from. Both sounds as it wouldn't fit into the early 1890's. Maybe a small talk at some meeting became a rumor.

Edit: What makes me even more suspicious is that on Google, a search engine that usually finds the absurdest combinations, only finds explanations for kids like "people wondered why light bulbs become yellow whereas iron becomes red" when searched for "Glühbirne+Planck". One would expect that such a legend would appear on German websites. It doesn't.
I've not read the website, but it's true that the very accurate measurements of the black-body spectrum over a wide range of wave lengths were done by Rubens and Kurlbaum at the "Physikalisch technische Reichsanstalt" (then the "bureau of standards" in Germany) with the motivation to establish a standard for the upcoming light bulbs. One should note that Germany in 1880ies was booming in science and technology compared to the pretty low state (compared to e.g., Britain) before, and the Physikalisch Technische Reichsanstalt. The PTR was founded in 1887 by Werner von Siemens and Hermann von Helmholtz, who was also its first president. Planck was closely related to the researchers at the Reichsanstalt and got the data on the high-precision measurement of the black-body spectrum first hand. In this, pretty indirect sense, physics has to thank the need for standards in lightning technology for helping to discover quantum theory (in it's "old version").
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42 and dextercioby
  • #11
fresh_42 said:
My major doubts come from what this "bureau of standards" should have been.

It refers to PTB. See
https://www.ptb.de/cms/en/about-us-careers/about-us/history-of-ptr-and-ptb.html

Note that a lot of countries founded their NMIs at the end o the 1890s. PTB was first(?) but NIST was founded in 1901 and NPL (UK) was founded in 1902.
This is all connected to the fact the first CGPM was held in Paris in 1889; i.e. the creation of a "proper" international system of units.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K