Tech2025
- 47
- 7
Wouldn't the chain easily get caught on a rock or something? And how does metal provide more traction than rubber wheels?
Last edited:
The discussion centers around the effectiveness of tire chains in providing traction on snow compared to standard rubber tires. Participants explore various aspects of this topic, including mechanics, practical experiences, and hypothetical scenarios related to traction in snowy conditions.
Participants express a range of views on the effectiveness of chains versus rubber tires, with some supporting the benefits of chains while others raise concerns about their practicality and potential issues. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the overall effectiveness and practicality of using chains.
Participants do not reach a consensus on the mechanics of traction provided by chains versus rubber tires, and there are varying assumptions about conditions under which chains may or may not be effective.
Tech2025 said:Wouldn't the chain easily get caught on a rocket
That's like asking if a paddle boat with just a cylinder and no paddles would work better than one with paddles.Tech2025 said:Wouldn't the chain easily get caught on a rocket or something? And how does metal provide more traction than rubber wheels?
Rock* lolphinds said:That's like asking if a paddle boat with just a cylinder and no paddles would work better than one with paddles.
Also, one generally doesn't drive over rockets.
Chains are the next best thing to snow studs or spikes that you find on specialist snow tyres. The reason for the improved traction is probably the higher local pressure under the chain links which can cause local melting and allow them to dig in where the shallow tread of the tyre will not.Tech2025 said:Rock* lol