Why do eddy currents flow the opposite direction to the right-hand-screw-rule?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the behavior of eddy currents in relation to magnetic fields and the right-hand rule, particularly focusing on why eddy currents appear to flow in a direction that seems contrary to the expectations set by the right-hand screw rule. The scope includes theoretical explanations, the application of Lenz's law, and the implications of energy conservation in electromagnetic phenomena.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that eddy currents are observed to flow in a direction that appears opposite to what the right-hand rule would suggest when a magnetic field is applied.
  • Others argue that eddy currents only occur when there is a changing magnetic field, which is a key factor in their generation.
  • Several participants reference Lenz's law, suggesting it dictates that eddy currents will oppose the change in magnetic field, leading to confusion about the right-hand rule's application.
  • One participant emphasizes that the right-hand rule applies to the magnetic field created by a current, not to currents induced by changing magnetic fields.
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between energy conservation and the behavior of eddy currents, with some suggesting that this principle underlies the observed phenomena.
  • A later post introduces a textbook figure to clarify the direction of eddy currents in relation to changing magnetic fields, indicating that the induced magnetic field opposes changes in the external field.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the application of the right-hand rule and Lenz's law, with no consensus reached on the underlying reasons for the observed behavior of eddy currents. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the precise nature of the relationship between these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the need for clarity regarding the definitions and conditions under which eddy currents are generated, as well as the assumptions involved in applying Lenz's law and the right-hand rule.

toneboy1
Messages
172
Reaction score
0
I've noticed in demonstrations that when you've got a magnetic field going through an iron core, say coming out of the page at you, that the eddy currents circulating perpendicular to them will flow clock-wise. But if you had a wire loop and put a current through it clockwise that it would produce a magnetic field going in the page, the opposite direction.

What is it that makes the electrons or whatever in the core go that way instead of adhereing to the rule?

Thanks very much.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You will, surely, only get eddy currents when the magnetic field changes?
 
Yes, but for the short time when the magnetic field is pointing out of the page.

I think this is Lenz's law, but I don't get why it doesn't follow the Right hand curl or screw rule.
 
OK. What causes eddy currents? Answer that first.
 
The magnetic field line passing through the material...thats the phenomenon.
 
Nope. Eddy currents are produced by changing magnetic field, and they follow lenz law.
 
yeah, so changing magnetic field through material, but you're saying lenz's law dictates the direction of the eddy currents will be the opposite to right hand rule?

Cheers
 
Lenz's law is the electrical equivalent to Newton's third law. It has to work that way round or any current would just get bigger and bigger - like the impossible situation where the reaction force was in the direction of the original push . . . . . .. zooooooooom!
Inductance is very analogous to Mass - just as Capacitance is analogous to a spring constant.
 
Lenz's law is simply the outcome of law of conservation of energy...Change in current induce magnetic field and change in magnetic filed produce current and this cannot go like chain violating law of conservation of energy...
 
  • #10
toneboy1 said:
yeah, so changing magnetic field through material, but you're saying lenz's law dictates the direction of the eddy currents will be the opposite to right hand rule?

Cheers

What is right hand rule used for? To find the direction of magnetic field setup by a wire loop.
Since the magnetic field you are talking about isn't created by the eddy current loop, why do you think it need to follow right hand rule. Here, instead, the eddy current loop is setup by the magnetic field (changing). You need to understand the difference.
You are missing one thing here, the eddy current lopp also creates magnetic field. And this Eddy-Magnetic-field will be created in accordance to right hand rule. And the lenz-law now comes into play. It says that, in response to change in applied-magnetic field, the eddy current magnetic field will be setup so as to oppose the change. That tells you the direction of eddy current.

Remember the clasic experiment where you point a North pole towards a coil and observe
1. No motion no current
2. Moving towards the coil, some current
3. Moving away from coil, some current but opposite direction

In each case, there is magnetic field pointing toward the coil. The current in coil is equivalent to eddy current.
 
  • #11
I understand that Lenz's law it due to concervation of energy and those analogies.

Thanks for making that distinction clear, that the right hand rule is for magnetic fields due to current, not current due to changing fields (if I understand you correctly). But what I want to know is, is there an actual physics explanation for the contrary direction, or is this just part of the phenomina of the universe, part of the laws like gravity which we can't explain but we can observe keeping everything in order?

Thanks
 
  • #12
toneboy1 said:
But what I want to know is, is there an actual physics explanation for the contrary direction

Can you Kindly tell me where is there a contradiction?
 
  • #13
"Contradiction" doesn't mean "contra direction".

The "actual Physics reason" is energy conservation. You can't get more Physicsy than that.

You want a hand-waving, mechanical explanation? No point; the basic Energy consideration says it all.
 
  • #14
thecritic said:
Can you Kindly tell me where is there a contradiction?

no 'contradiction' in concept, in opposite direction
 
  • #15
sophiecentaur said:
"Contradiction" doesn't mean "contra direction".

The "actual Physics reason" is energy conservation. You can't get more Physicsy than that.

You want a hand-waving, mechanical explanation? No point; the basic Energy consideration says it all.

I do appreciate your help. But energy conservation, makes sense, but there is cause and effect, like there aren't energy faries that come down and make the eddy currents when you move a magnet :P

Kind Regards,

Rob
 
  • #16
I realize this thread is old but here is a figure from a textbook:



In this figure you can see the direction the author claims the eddy currents travel in. Notice that for the leading edge eddy current (the on on the right hand side of the picture in the direction of the F_pull vector) that the external magnetic field of the dipole is decreasing. Lenz's law tells us that the direction of the induced magnetic field will oppose the change in the external magnetic field. Since the external field is decreasing, in order to oppose this decrease the induced magnetic field will point in the same direction as the external field, which in this case is from North to South. From here by the right hand rule it is clear that the eddy current for the leading edge will be in the direction shown by the author.

Likewise the same logic works for the trailing edge where the external field is increasing, by Lenze's Law the induced field will oppose the change by being in the opposite direction, and the right hand rule gives us the direction shown in the image.

I added this post because the discussion was unclear without a picture representing what was being talked about.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K