Why do fields vanish at infinite time during canonical transformations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ndung200790
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qft
ndung200790
Messages
519
Reaction score
0
The footnote at &7.6 page 329 writes:
'' Recall that by canonical transformation, we mean a transformation from a set of phase space coordinates \Psi^{a},\Pi_{a} to some other phase space \tilde{\Psi}^{a},\tilde{\Pi}_{a} such that
[\tilde{\Psi}^{a},\tilde{\Pi}_{b}]_{P}=\delta^{a}_{b} and [\tilde{\Psi}^{a},\tilde{\Psi}^{b}]_{P}=[\tilde{\Pi}_{a},\tilde{\Pi}_{b}]_{P}=0.It follows that the
Poisson brackets for any functions A,B are the same whether calculated interms of ψ,∏ or in terms
of \tilde{\Psi} and \tilde{\Pi}.It also follows that the Hamintonian equation of motions are the same for ψ,∏ before and after being transformed.
The Lagrangian is changed by canonical transformation,but only by a time-derivative,which does not affect the action.''
To calculate the action we must to time integrate the Lagrangian,but by the transformation the Lagrangian changed by time derivative of a function of field(?),so the action changed by the function being calculated at infinite past and future.Then why we know field vanish at infinite time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So far it is an assumption that in infinite past or future,the fields will not give any contribution.As far as why the lagrangian changes by a time derivative,you can show in a simple way that for the hamiltonian eqn. of motion to be same after canonical transformation the lagrangian can change only by a time derivative.So far however it is a restricted version.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top