Why Do Fundamental Trig Identities Confuse Me?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around confusion regarding fundamental trigonometric identities and a specific equation that needs to be proven. The equation involves terms such as tan(x), sec(x), and csc(x), and the user struggles to simplify it correctly. Suggestions include using LaTeX for clearer mathematical representation and a recommendation to multiply terms to facilitate simplification. The user is encouraged to seek additional resources for better understanding. Overall, the thread highlights common challenges in grasping trigonometric identities and the importance of clear communication in mathematical discussions.
WastingBody
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I just don't get this stuff. I've been trying on my own with the book. Also, is there a better way to post this?

Homework Statement


tanx 1 + secx
_________ + _________ = 2csc x
1 + secx tanx
I need to prove that this side equals the other.

Homework Equations



http://users.rcn.com/mwhitney.massed/trigresources/trig-reference.html
^^The reference I was using.

The Attempt at a Solution


tanx(tanx) 1 + secx(1 + secx)
_________ + _________ = 2csc x
1 + secx(tanx) tanx(1 + secx)
tan2 x 1 + 2secx + sec2x
________________ + _________________
1 + secx(tanx) (tanx)1 + secx
tan2x + 1 + 2secx + sec2x
_________________________
1 + cos 1/x(tanx)sec2x + 2cos 1/x + sec2x
_________________________
1 + cos 1/x(tanx)

This is as far as I get before I get lost.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
First look at https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=8997"thread to learn how to use LaTex. With that you can do this:

\frac { \tan x } { 1 + \sec x} + \frac {1 + \sec x} {\tan x} = 2 \csc x

Now, try multipling the top and bottom of the first term on the left by 1 - \sec x

BTW: Just click on my equations to see what I typed to produce them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top