I Why Do Gluons Decay into u-anti-u Pairs Instead of Z0 Bosons?

Onjii
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Physics news on Phys.org
sorry it's a d and anti-d pair!
 
the Z0 boson could do that, but ... weak force is called 'weak' for a reason... the Z0 would be way too off-shell.
It's much more likely that a gluon will do the job... and in most of cases, if you can draw a diagram with a gluon, you'll preferably draw it with that... except for if you are interested to less probable stuff...
 
  • Like
Likes Onjii
Thanks, just the kind of answer i was looking for!
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top