Why Do Horizontally Fired and Vertically Dropped Bullets Land Simultaneously?

AI Thread Summary
Both horizontally fired and vertically dropped bullets land simultaneously because they experience the same vertical acceleration due to gravity, covering the same vertical distance in the same amount of time. The thrust from the gun only affects the horizontal motion of the bullet, not its vertical descent. If a bullet is fired straight down, it will reach the ground faster than one that is simply dropped. When considering long-distance aiming, the parabolic trajectory of a bullet must be accounted for, complicating accuracy. Overall, neglecting air resistance, horizontal and vertical motions can be treated independently in this context.
divya_basuti
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Why does a bullet fired horizontal and bullet dropped vertically downward, land at the same time? Shouldn't the object thrown downward fall sooner as it has a shorter distance to cover even though gravity pulls both of the down at the same rate?

Does it have to do anything with the fact that the bullet which is fired has greater thrust?

Would the same apply if the bullet was fired in both cases? i.e. both the bullets shot from a gun at the same velocity and speed, one vertically downward and the other horizontally.

Also if a bullet shot from a gun travels in a parabolic path wouldn't that make it very hard to aim straight?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Neglecting air resistance (which does make a slight difference, but it's way beyond the scope of discussion) you can look at horizontal and vertical motions as completely separate. Both bullets have the same vertical distance to cover, and so take the same amount of time to cover that distance. Obviously, if you fire a gun straight down, rather than just drop the bullet, this bullet would get to ground much faster. Regardless, however, a bullet that has left the muzzle no longer experiences any thrust, and is in free projectile motion. And yes, it's something you have to take into account if you are aiming from long distance, and yes, it does make it quite a bit harder to hit your target.
 
K^2 said:
Neglecting air resistance (which does make a slight difference, but it's way beyond the scope of discussion) you can look at horizontal and vertical motions as completely separate. Both bullets have the same vertical distance to cover, and so take the same amount of time to cover that distance. Obviously, if you fire a gun straight down, rather than just drop the bullet, this bullet would get to ground much faster. Regardless, however, a bullet that has left the muzzle no longer experiences any thrust, and is in free projectile motion. And yes, it's something you have to take into account if you are aiming from long distance, and yes, it does make it quite a bit harder to hit your target.

Thank you
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top