Why Do I Feel Rusty with Corrosion Knowledge?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a user's request for help in developing a website or memoirs related to corrosion experiments, specifically mentioning a desire to document 14 experiments. The user expresses feeling "rusty" in their corrosion knowledge and seeks assistance to refresh their understanding. They mention specific experiments, such as the reaction between acid and metal, indicating a focus on practical applications of corrosion science. The conversation highlights the importance of collaboration and sharing knowledge in the field of corrosion. Overall, the user is looking for guidance to enhance their expertise and create educational resources.
atomy1000
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
hi everyone...
I want the experience of almost 14, if you could help to develop a website or memoirs of your College, I'll thank you
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you rephrase - your post doesn't make any sense.
 
russ_watters said:
Could you rephrase - your post doesn't make any sense.

sorry...
my language is very weak:smile:
I want about 14 experiments in corrosion , if you could help to develop a website or memoirs of your College, I'll thank you
 
Last edited:
1) Acid + Metal

2) Rusting
 
"I want experience of corrosion."

I used to know stuff but now I am rusty. :cry:
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

Corrosion Experiment Design: Alloys, Prevention & Marine Vessels
Replies
1
Views
3K
What are the factors that contribute to crevice corrosion in stainless steel?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Chemistry in Daily Life: Coursework Ideas & Experiments
Replies
5
Views
3K
What Role Does Seawater and HCl Play in Electrochemical Corrosion?
Replies
3
Views
4K
Biology Why do fatty acids burn in the presence of carbon?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Fossil Dating for the anthropology department
Replies
6
Views
4K
What Should Be the Control in a Corrosion Experiment?
Replies
4
Views
9K
Corrosion data using Electrochemistry
Replies
3
Views
2K
Gas Turbine & Psychrometric chart
Replies
5
Views
2K
Help with an Experiment Concerning a Copper Sulfate
Replies
5
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top