Why Do I Need to Divide the Velocity by 2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter M1keh
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the need to divide the Sun's velocity by 2 when calculating orbital dynamics in a two-body system involving the Earth and the Sun. The user initially struggles with maintaining a circular orbit while balancing the velocities of both bodies around their barycenter. It is clarified that the orbital velocity formula used does not account for the mass of the Sun, necessitating the use of the reduced mass to accurately calculate velocities. The adjustment of subtracting half the Sun's velocity from the Earth's is identified as a method to correct the orbit's circularity. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the importance of understanding the dynamics of two-body systems and the implications of mass on velocity calculations.
M1keh
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
Folks, hope someone can point me in the right direction. I've knocked up a perl program that pushes the planets around the Sun, using F=GMm/r^2 and f=ma, but there's one adjustment I've added to make it work and I don't know why ...

The routines use 'v = sqrt[GM/(r*(1 +/- e))]' to calculate the velocity at apogee / perigee and set Earth's distance from the Sun as 149597890000. With the Sun sitting at the centre (Barycenter ??), I'm then trying to balance the Sun / Earth around the Barycenter to give a circular orbit.

Calculating a multipler as the Earth Mass / Sun Mass, I'm moving the Sun away from the centre by 149597890000 * multiplier and then subtracting the same amount from the Earth's distance, to keep the distance from the Sun the same.

Starting with the Earth's speed at perihelion ( obviously constant for a circular orbit ), I then need to set the Sun off in the opposite direction to keep the two circling the Barycentre. I'm calculating the Sun's velocity as Earth's velocity times the same multipler, I was then expecting to subtract the Sun's velocity from the Earth's to keep the system balanced.

Here's my problem ( at least the one that I know about ) ... When subtracting the Sun's velocity from the Earth's, I have to half it. ie. Vs = Ve * Me/Ms; Ve = Ve - Vs/2. This isn't approx 2, but exactly 2. 1.99 doesn't work 2.01 doesn't work, only 2.0.

Tried working this out with 1/2 MV^2 and the diffs in velocity but nothing seems to work out. Could just be my maths.

So, where does this come from ? Why subtract the distance as it is, but divide the velocity by 2.0 ?


Thanks.



Mike.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by "doesn't work"? The orbit is not circular? The whole system has a net velocity?

Vs = Ve * Me/Ms is required to keep the whole system in place, and you should use these velocities as initial velocity for both objects. Vs in one direction, Ve in the other direction. Why do you modify Ve afterwards?

v=sqrt(GM/r) gives you the orbital velocity if the mass of Earth is negligible. This is not true, if you have to care about the velocity of the sun. Use the reduced mass \mu=\frac{M_s m_e}{M_s+m_e} instead. The radius is now the distance earth/barycenter, the distance to sun is larger by a factor (1+Me/Ms). If r is your true distance to the sun (which is different from the semi-major axis of earth!), both things cancel. But keep in mind that r is not the distance to the barycenter now. This v is already Ve, you do not have to correct it.
 
Thanks mfb. That seems to be what I'm missing. Your formula for the reduced distance doesn't show up. Can you post a test version ?

When I say "doesn't work", I mean that the orbit isn't circular. However, simply deducting half of the Sun's velocity from the Earth's corrects the problem. Probably something to do with the diff between 'v=sqrt(GM/r)' and the correct function ?
 
Oh. One more thing. What's the velocity of the Sun ? Is it Ve * (Me/Ms) ? Or can you use the formula to generate both the Earth's and the Sun's velocity ?

Any idea why subtracting 1/2 Sun's velocity from Earth's works in my version ? Is it obvious from the correct formula ?
 
You can quote my post to look at the source. It needs JavaScript to get displayed.
μ = M_s m_e / (M_s + m_e)

It should be possible to calculate the velocity of the sum with those formulas, but it is easier to calculate it based on the velocity of earth. If you have this velocity around the barycenter, the sun just follows a smaller circle (or ellipse) to keep the barycenter there. And yes, Vs=Ve * (Me/Ms)
 
Thanks mfb, that looks spot on. Not sure why it worked the way I was doing it, but using a Sun mass of (Ms*Ms)/(Ms+Me) when calculating the velocity at perihelion and then setting the Sun velocity to Ve*(Me/Ms) gives the same results without the tweak.

Mind you, this still give the distance as the SemiMajor axis. May have to play with it a bit.


Thanks.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...

Similar threads

Back
Top