Why do ion and electron transfers in ceramics always add up to 1?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the principle that the sum of ion transfers and electron transfers in ceramics equals one. When an electron is removed from an atom, it becomes a positively charged ion, and the charge magnitude increases with the number of electrons removed. The conversation touches on the concept of electrical neutrality in nature, where negative charges (electrons) are typically balanced by positive charges (protons). The reference to a textbook highlights the complexity of understanding these interactions in ceramics. Overall, the relationship between ion and electron transfers is rooted in the fundamental principles of charge balance in materials.
asdf1
Messages
734
Reaction score
0
Why for any material, the number of ion transfers plus electron transfers equal 1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
asdf1 said:
Why for any material, the number of ion transfers plus electron transfers equal 1?
I do not understand the question, but when 1 electron is removed from an atom, the atom becomes an ion that has a net positive charge of the same magnitude. Remove 2 electrons, and the ion has a net positive charge of twice the magnitude of the electron charge. Protons and electrons have opposite charges of equal magnitude.

Nature as far as we know it, or at least in our part of the universe, tends to be electrically neutral. Negative charges (electrons) are never far from the corresponding positive charges, and they tend to get closer whenever the opportunity arises.
 
Actually, I'm not too sure of what that sentence means either... Just for fun, I picked up a book, "Fundamentals of Ceramics" to read, which is by Micheal Barsoum, and that sentence is on pg 213...
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top