Why do large elliptical galaxies not collapse due to their gravity?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of why large elliptical galaxies do not collapse under their own gravity, despite having relatively low rotational speeds. Participants explore various factors that may influence the stability and shape of these galaxies, including the role of dust, angular momentum, and the dynamics of galaxy mergers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the lack of sufficient dust in large elliptical galaxies prevents friction that could lead to a change in shape, allowing stars to maintain their orbits.
  • Others argue that the velocities of individual stars in elliptical galaxies are high enough to keep them in orbit around the center of mass, despite the overall low bulk rotation.
  • A participant mentions that spherical ellipticals are thought to be later stage galaxies formed from the collisions of spiral galaxies, but questions whether they can revert to spiral forms.
  • There is a discussion about the impact of supermassive black holes on the shape of galaxies, with some suggesting that their brightness can strip galaxies of dust, affecting their structure.
  • One participant highlights that new simulations challenge the conventional wisdom regarding galaxy mergers, suggesting that mergers can lead to the formation of disk galaxies rather than just elliptical ones.
  • Another participant raises the possibility that elliptical galaxies may form after several mergers or when two equal-sized galaxies collide, potentially canceling out their angular momenta.
  • It is noted that differential angular velocities could lead to shape changes in galaxies, indicating that dynamics play a significant role in their evolution.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the mechanisms that prevent elliptical galaxies from collapsing and the processes involved in their formation. The discussion remains unresolved, with various hypotheses presented but no consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on definitions of galaxy shapes, the role of gas and dust in galaxy dynamics, and the unresolved nature of the processes involved in galaxy mergers and their outcomes.

Tanelorn
Messages
906
Reaction score
15
I have wondered this for a while now, what stops large elliptical galaxies from collapsing due to their gravity?
Their rotational speed is relatively small, at the rotational axis perhaps zero, so what is preventing the stars from being pulled towards the center? Do spherical ellipticals flatten with time?

http://www.scienceworldreport.com/a...nt-elliptical-galaxies-move-slowly-surely.htm
 
Space news on Phys.org
Tanelorn said:
I have wondered this for a while now, what stops large elliptical galaxies from collapsing due to their gravity?
Their rotational speed is relatively small, at the rotational axis perhaps zero, so what is preventing the stars from being pulled towards the center? Do spherical ellipticals flatten with time?

http://www.scienceworldreport.com/a...nt-elliptical-galaxies-move-slowly-surely.htm
A galaxy's overall shape cannot change without friction. If a galaxy has enough dust in it, the friction between the dust and the stars will pull the stars into a disk (a spiral galaxy). If there isn't enough dust, the stars just continue in their individual orbits and the overall shape of the galaxy remains relatively unchanged (until the galaxy collides with another).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tanelorn
The article explains that the velocities refer to the bulk rotation. It's what you get when you average velocities of all stars. In elliptical galaxies stars go every which way, each individual one having large enough velocity to remain in orbit around the centre of galactic mass. In other words, if you had two stars going in opposite directions, their average velocity would be 0km/s.

The discovery the article mentions reveals that the bulk rotation is not actually 0 as previously thought.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tanelorn
Thanks for confirming Chalnoth, I think I worked out that one independently, because I had read spherical ellipticals are later stage galaxies following collisions of spirals, and I don't ever recall reading that spherical ellipticals could become spirals again.

Thanks for confirming bandersnatch, so the individual star velocities are high enough to maintain relative orbital positions.
 
Tanelorn said:
Thanks for confirming Chalnoth, I think I worked out that one independently, because I had read spherical ellipticals are later stage galaxies following collisions of spirals, and I don't ever recall reading that spherical ellipticals could become spirals again.

Thanks for confirming bandersnatch, so the individual star velocities are high enough to maintain relative orbital positions.
I think usually they remain elliptical because they just don't have any significant amount of dust to cause friction any longer. This is an active area of research, but I think it's generally expected that the behavior of the supermassive black hole at the galaxy's center is critical in determining the shape of the galaxy (when the supermassive black hole gets too bright, it strips the galaxy of dust).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tanelorn
Tanelorn said:
I had read spherical ellipticals are later stage galaxies following collisions of spirals

That was conventional wisdom, but it seems it has been challenged the last decade and now seems iffy with new observations targeted at the process:

"Conventional wisdom (based on computer simulations from the 1970s) said that when two big disk-shaped galaxies merged, they’d create a big elliptical, a fairly featureless spheroid of stars.

But about a decade ago, new-and-improved simulations by several teams suggested that, if the disk galaxies have a lot of gas, the object their merger creates will also be a disk galaxy, with spiral arms or maybe even a bar in the center.

The reason is angular momentum. In a galaxy’s disk, stars and gas rotate together around the galactic center. When the disk galaxies merge and their material mixes, the stars can steal rotational energy from the gas via gravitational interactions, begetting a bulbous shape — but gas doesn’t steal from other gas. Instead, gas from both galaxies “shares” rotational energy. When there aren’t enough stars to steal the gas’s angular momentum, the material will inevitably settle down and create a disk in the newly formed galaxy."

"[Detailed description of observations. Then:] In short, roughly half (46%) of the galaxies created by mergers are disk galaxies. The team can’t actually confirm that the galaxies that created the 37 they observed were also disk-shaped — but given that the long-gone progenitors had a whole lot of gas and the right rotational properties to create gas disks, it’s not crazy to connect the result with predictions for disks’ mergers.

Regardless, the observations confirm that, indeed, disks are a common byproduct of galaxy mergers. That makes sense: big spirals are the most common type of galaxy in today’s universe, and so the fact that mergers can create them helps explain why."

[ http://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/mergers-create-disk-galaxies-10022014/ ]

There is also a nice simulation that shows the merger-into-disk process.

TL;DR: What Chalnoth said.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tanelorn
Thanks Torbjorn, so would ellipticals happen after several mergers when the galaxies have become very large, or perhaps when two equal sized galaxies collide which are rotating opposite to each other, canceling out their angular momentums?
 
Tanelorn said:
Thanks Torbjorn, so would ellipticals happen after several mergers when the galaxies have become very large,

You are welcome!

If the conventional wisdom is incorrect, they would tend to happen because they are running out of gas over time (so could have time to participate in several mergers and grow large) and because their supermassive central black holes would tend to be disturbed, tend to interact, tend to grow and tend to scatter gas as Chalnoth describes.

Mostly I thought the article was timely supporting what Chalnoth had said.

Tanelorn said:
or perhaps when two equal sized galaxies collide which are rotating opposite to each other, canceling out their angular momentums?

It could perhaps happen, but the collision in itself would result in some excess angular momentum. (See their animation.)

Cancellation would be a very low likelihood result.
 
Chalnoth said:
A galaxy's overall shape cannot change without friction.
Differential angular velocities of different parts are sufficient for shape changes. Or the dynamics of mass concentrations in spiral galaxies.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tanelorn

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
23K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K