Gravitons: Explained for New Learners

  • Thread starter LeeJeffries
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Gravitons
In summary: So the atom is in a superposition of states, and the energy of the system is not quantized.So far, so classical. But what about gravity? What happens if you try to quantize gravity?The answer is that you can't. That's why GR is not a quantum theory.
  • #1
LeeJeffries
17
0
I am new to all this "stuff", so please forgive me

If GR describes gravity as a straightline movement through a curved space-time, why does there need to be a "carrier" at the quantum level? What would it be carried between?

When people say at the quantum level GR stops working, is there a simple way of explaining why that is? I know its something in the maths compared with what is observed, but is there any way for me to understand what exactly "isn't working"?

Thanks
Lee
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
GR is not a quantum theory, as you'll be aware, so it has no need of gravitons as it stands.

The quantum field theories we know are based on a Lagrangian that has terms for (say) 2 particles and the interaction between them. If the particles exchange energy and momentum, it is via the interaction term. In a quantum theory the energy exchange is quantized and those interaction quanta are the virtual particles, or carriers.

The problem with quantizing Newtonian gravity is that it is unrenormalizable because of the gravitational self energy.

The nearest thing to a Lagrangian in GR is the Einstein-Hilbert action, which seems to have no interaction term and describes a kinematical ( as opposed to dynamic) system. So the recipe for making a quantum theory doesn't work in the first place.

When people talk about gravitons they are assuming that a 'standard' quantum field theory for gravity will be found where the interaction term in the Lagrangian will be the product of two rank-2 tensors, something like AmnTmn where A is a tensor potential and T is the energy momentum tensor of the source. This will give a carrier particle with spin-2 for attraction and one with spin-0 for repulsion.

[caution - I'm not an expert so don't take this as a complete or 100% correct answer]
 
Last edited:
  • #3
We have three forces in nature: strong, electroweak, and gravitational. The first two are quantized. If you try to couple a quantized field to a non-quantized one, you get a theory that is not self-consistent. E.g., this is what Bohr and his followers wanted to do in the early 20th century: quantize the atom while keeping the electromagnetic field classical. It doesn't work. For example, if a classical EM wave impinges on some quantized atoms, ionizing some of them via the photoelectric effect, there is no way to to maintain conservation of energy.
 

1. What are gravitons?

Gravitons are hypothetical particles that are thought to be responsible for the force of gravity in the universe. They are predicted by the theory of quantum mechanics and are believed to be the carrier particles of the gravitational force.

2. How do gravitons work?

Gravitons work by interacting with other particles through the exchange of energy. They are thought to be constantly moving and interacting with matter, causing the force of gravity to exist between objects.

3. Can gravitons be detected?

Currently, there is no direct evidence for the existence of gravitons and they have not been detected by any experiments. However, scientists are working on ways to indirectly detect them through high-energy particle collisions and gravitational wave observations.

4. How are gravitons related to Einstein's theory of general relativity?

Einstein's theory of general relativity describes gravity as the curvature of space-time caused by the presence of massive objects. Gravitons, on the other hand, are predicted by quantum mechanics and describe gravity as a force carried by particles. Scientists are still working on reconciling these two theories.

5. What implications do gravitons have for our understanding of the universe?

If gravitons are proven to exist, it would provide a more complete understanding of the fundamental forces in the universe. It could also help to bridge the gap between quantum mechanics and general relativity, leading to a more unified theory of physics.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
6
Views
729
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
966
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
8
Replies
264
Views
15K
Replies
3
Views
139
Back
Top